Posts Tagged ‘behavior change’

Health Coaching Success Metrics and 8 More Behavior Change Benchmarks

July 7th, 2016 by Patricia Donovan

Satisfied clients and participants on track for goal attainment are two hallmarks of a can't-lose coaching initiative.

Satisfied clients and participants on track for goal attainment are two hallmarks of a can’t-lose coaching initiative.

What are the hallmarks of a winning health coaching strategy? The answer depends on what’s being measured: the effectiveness of the individual coach, the participant’s progress, or overall program success.

That’s the feedback from 111 healthcare organizations responding to the 2016 Health Coaching Survey by the Healthcare Intelligence Network.

If you’re looking to measure the health coach’s success, then client satisfaction is the best indicator, say 27 percent of these respondents.

On the other hand, for a gauge of an individual’s progress, look to the participant’s goal attainment, report 78 percent.

This same metric—goal achievement—is also the best indicator of program success as a whole, agree 64 percent.

The May 2016 survey documented a number of other health coaching benchmarks, including the following:

  • Motivational interviewing is a coach’s top tactic to effect behavior change, say 83 percent.
  • All-important ‘face time’ with coaches is plentiful: 47 percent embed or co-locate health coaches at points of care, with most onsite coaching occurring in primary care offices (50 percent) or at employer work sites (50 percent).
  • Nine percent even embed health coaches in hospital emergency rooms.
  • While a majority focuses on coaching high-risk individuals with multiple chronic illnesses, 51 percent now extend eligibility for health coaching to individuals stratified as ‘rising risk.’
  • Nearly half of respondents—48 percent—offer health coaching to patients and health plan members with behavioral health diagnoses.
  • Reflecting the surge in telehealth, 12 percent of respondents offer video health coaching sessions to clients.

Download an executive summary of the 2016 Health Coaching survey.

Infographic: Motivational Interviewing

November 19th, 2014 by Melanie Matthews

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a standardized, evidence-based approach for facilitating behavior change, according to a new infographic by Health Sciences Institute.

The infographic explores the four key phases of MI and evidence to support MI’s impact.

Evidence-Based Health Coaching: Patient-Centered Competencies for Population HealthTo succeed in a value-driven system, healthcare organizations will need to shift primary responsibility for health management to the individuals it serves. Evidence-based health coaching supports these population health goals by aligning best practice care with patients’ needs and values.

Evidence-Based Health Coaching: Patient-Centered Competencies for Population Health presents a template for evidence-based coaching that emphasizes clinical competencies, along with real-life applications from a health system already utilizing clinical health coaches within its value-based healthcare network.

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

Have an infographic you’d like featured on our site? Click here for submission guidelines.

Clinical Health Coaching Transforms Care Conversation

May 27th, 2014 by Patricia Donovan

Evidence-based health coaching drives the population health management processes required to succeed in a value-based system—the industry’s quantum shift to ‘Healthcare 3.0,’ advises William Applegate, executive director of the Iowa Chronic Care Consortium.

How do we change to this Healthcare 3.0? One way is to create real patients that are in patient-centered medical homes. NCQA level three medical home recognition is great, but there are still a number of those medical homes that need to add ‘meat and potatoes’ to what they have achieved.

Next, we need to build a true population health capacity. We need to develop differentiated health teams. You can’t really create a robust health coach as a professional in an organization and then not change the position description of others. The trained clinical health coach can actually improve the ability of a physician to operate at the highest level of their license. That’s part of how a health coach fits into a healthcare team. It’s not just an addition. It’s a kind of reformation of how we’re approaching healthcare with patients.

You need to use trained performance health coaches to make this shift. And you need to activate patients towards self-care. And as I say over and over, we really need to inspire their own accountability.

There are two big features in transforming care. One is transforming the conversation, and the other one is transforming the care process. In transforming the conversation, we need to employ a performance-oriented health coaching. That’s more than motivational interviewing.

We need to rely on the science of behavior change. An awful lot of healthcare professionals deep down don’t believe that we can move individual behaviors. I don’t think we can change people’s lives dramatically. But we certainly can change some of their health outcomes, because we know that our chronic diseases are essentially learned; they’re exacerbated by things that we do to ourselves.

Excerpted from: Evidence-Based Health Coaching: Patient-Centered Competencies for Population Health

Support Outcomes-Based Health Incentives with Communication, Culture of Health

February 8th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

More than half of U.S. companies offer financial incentives for participation in health management programs.

Even while rewards for biometric measures continue to proliferate, it’s best to review some behavior change basics before adding outcomes-based incentives to a wellness offering, advises John Riedel, president of Riedel and Associates.

Behavioral economics, a field built on the belief that people are susceptible to a wide range of influences, is a good place to start, he says. “An individual’s environment, work culture, emotions and social networks all have strong impacts on the decisions that they make,” said Riedel during a recent webinar on Health and Wellness Incentives: Positioning for Outcome-Based Rewards.

An individual’s motivation can be either extrinsic — motivated by what they will gain when the task is completed, which is usually money, or intrinsic: stemming from the individual’s own desire to accomplish and perform the task. With intrinsic motivation, the result is its own reward. Working with others, as in a team-based wellness competition, is one factor that can build intrinsic motivation, Riedel notes.

Ultimately, intrinsic motivation is the primary principle of behavior change, he stresses. However, money still talks when it comes to completing select wellness activities. A Towers Watson Staying@Work Survey Report found that in 2011, half of respondents offered financial rewards for participation in a health program. Biometrics, HRAs and team wellness challenges are particularly responsive to financial incentives, he adds.

Health coaching is another heavily incented activity, a strategy Riedel finds useful. “”If you’re using progress-based incentives, lifestyle coaching can help you to set the goals that are of the greatest interest to you.”

As health incentives evolve from participation-based to progress-based — created according to the individual’s place on the health continuum — to outcomes-based, healthcare companies need to keep an eye on the legal requirements surrounding these programs. One example is the ACA’s “reasonable alternative standard,” which protects individuals who are unable to meet an outcomes-based incentive.

For example, a morbidly obese employee might not be able to hit weight and blood pressure targets set for the overall workforce, so that employer would have to create a reasonable alternative standard for that employee.

The ACA also delineates wellness reward amounts and eligibility standards and distinguishes between participatory wellness programs and health-contingent wellness programs.

Ultimately, regardless of the incentives offered, participation in wellness activities is greatest when incentives are paired with a strong organizational culture of health and a compelling communications program that is “comprehensive, organization-wide (with a mix of information and inspiration), as well as the use of posters, the Internet, and social tools.”

And one final behavior change principle to keep in mind: people tend to follow the default option, so when designing health and wellness offerings, make the healthy choice the default.

For more advice on incentive benefits design, listen to this audio interview with John Riedel.

Q&A: Integrated Health Coaching Brightens Total Healthcare Picture of Population

November 21st, 2012 by Jessica Fornarotto

To determine the coachee’s values, the health coach listens to achieve empathy and understanding, which demands that they have a sense of an individual value, says Kelly Merriman, vice president of service delivery at HealthFitness.

Prior to their presentations during a September webinar on Integrated Health Coaching: The Next Generation in Health Behavior Change Management, Merriman and Dr. Dennis Richling, chief medical and wellness officer at HealthFitness, discussed HealthFitness’ transition to a population health management focus, why HealthFitness’ coaches target the chronic disease population and a new coaching tool called appreciative inquiry.

HIN: How has HealthFitness’ shift from a disease management to a population health management focus meshed with the industry’s post-reform models of care, for instance the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) and the accountable care organization (ACO)?

(Dr. Dennis Richling): HealthFitness has had a population health management focus for many years and we see that many of the same principals that we use in our approach are included in ACOs and in medical home models.

Recently, we took a new look at disease management, which traditionally has been a stand-alone service, largely focused on patient self-care issues separate from lifestyle coaching interventions. In our new model, health behaviors across the entire risk continuum are dealt with in a person-centric way, rather than a disease-centered approach. That of course aligns with some of the principles of the post-reform models of care, like the medical home, and even to some degree with ACOs, which are attempting to be responsible for the total healthcare picture of a population.

HIN: In your company’s three-tiered coaching across the continuum approach, where do most of the coaching candidates fall?

(Dr. Dennis Richling): In every population you find different numbers, but in a typical employer, we see that the greatest opportunity for coaching is in those individuals who have behaviors that can lead to chronic disease. A good example of an ideal candidate for our coaching program is a 40-year-old manager working 50 hours a week. His blood pressure isn’t high, his cholesterol is slightly elevated and he’s a little overweight. He doesn’t exercise regularly and while he tries to watch his fats, he isn’t eating the most healthy diet because he hasn’t figured out how to balance his work schedule and his family life, and being 40. He’s also at risk for chronic disease. If he adopts more healthy behaviors, he can avoid developing a chronic disease.

Then there are those who already have a chronic disease like diabetes or coronary artery disease. This is about 10-20 percent of a population, depending on the population we’re looking at. Instead of putting all of them into nurse coaching, like traditional disease management, we determine through claims and a short assessment if the disease is well managed. In our experience, about three-quarters of those with chronic disease are taking their medicines and managing their diseases relatively well, though, they still need help with the underlying lifestyle issues that led to the chronic disease.

Those individuals are matched with an advanced practice coach (APC) who understands their underlying chronic disease issues, but will work with them to achieve goals that they want to work on, like losing weight or exercising regularly. By far the smallest group is those with the newly diagnosed or uncontrolled chronic disease. We match them with nurse coaches who can most effectively work with their self-management approaches, with making sure that they follow their medication and care plans that the physicians have prescribed.

HIN: In tailoring a coaching program to the individual, how does a coach determine the coachee’s values?

(Kelly Merriman): We call it ‘listening until you don’t exist.’ Most people listen to get information or because they enjoy the process of exchanging perspectives. Our coaches listen to achieve empathy and understanding, which demands that they have a sense of an individual value. For example, Michelle is 46 years old and is significantly overweight. And because of her weight, she’s a pre-diabetic. She told her coach that she was ready to make a change. She knew her weight wasn’t only impacting her health, but also her self-esteem. Michelle’s coach listened and learned that she took pride in being a pillar of support for family and friends, that ‘never let them see you sweat’ mentality, which meant she was holding in her fears of being overwhelmed at times.

Imagine if a coach reflected back thoughtfully and said, “I’m hearing, Michelle, that you take pride in caring for others, that you value being competent and having others rely on you for support. And sometimes when things get to be a little too much, you overlook your own health.” Once a coach finds those values, they’ve got something to work with to promote hope and inspiration. It’s what we call motivation.

HIN: Could you provide some details on appreciative inquiry and perhaps describe a scenario in which a coach might employ this tool?

(Kelly Merriman): All too often when people want to change a behavior, they tend to focus on all the negatives. All the attention goes to focusing on what’s broken. That focus can hold a participant back from achieving their goal. Our coaches use appreciative inquiry to focus on the participant’s strengths instead. The appreciative inquiry approach deliberately seeks to discover that person’s exceptionality, through their unique gifts, strengths and qualities. We listen with intent to appreciate who they are during the early coaching interactions and then envision how they want their life to be.

Appreciative inquiry has low resistance as an approach to change because it builds upon the person’s positive core, the things that they already have going for them. It assumes that tapping into their positive experiences and strengths are useful in discovering their intrinsic motivation to change and development. This immediately shows the coach and the participant that they have faith in the ability to make a positive change.

As an example, let’s look at Michelle again. We want to appreciate what she’s got going for her and use that to help her to envision what her future may be. Michelle is overweight, pre-diabetic and feeling overwhelmed. Her coach learned that she’s committed to her health, takes pride in being a pillar of support for her family and friends and is organized and creative. Instead of focusing immediately on fixing what’s broken, that she eats too much between meals and doesn’t exercise enough, her coach focuses on envisioning Michelle’s idea of health, one that honors her strengths and her values. In this case, Michelle’s vision of health may be using her creativity and strengths of purpose to take care of her own self as well as the people she loves. She’ll make healthy choices, will see the results, and have the freedom to live the life she wants.