Archive for the ‘Transitions in Care’ Category

Infographic: End-of-Life Care in California

May 17th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Californians, like many Americans, frequently do not get the kind of care that they want at the end of their lives. This infographic from the California Healthcare Foundation documents research on end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries, and analyzes it in light of what is known about Californians' preferences for care as they approach death.

The research found sharp variation that cannot be explained by differences among patients in age, sex, or race.

End-of-Life Care in California

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

You may also be interested in this related resource: Case Management for Advanced Illness: Best Practices in End-of-Life Care.

Ideas to Ease Challenges of Mobile Health Adoption

May 10th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Many older patients are adept at mobile health technologies.

With the average worker accessing information via three or more mobile devices — laptop, tablet and phone — it stands to reason that 45 percent of this year’s Mobile Health respondents now offer smart phone apps, text messaging and mobile Web applications to engage and educate “three-screeners.”

But just because the healthcare industry has launched headlong into social business strategies hinging on mHealth technologies does not mean that all strategies are successful. Growing pains from early mHealth adoption include the challenges of cost, interoperability and infrastructure — not to mention the difficulty of measuring mHealth’s impact on cost and utilization, a concern noted by more than 60 percent of the 150 respondents to HIN's inaugural survey on Mobile Health trends.

Before jumping into mobile, social and cloud solutions, Andrew Dixon, senior vice president of marketing and operations, Igloo Software, proposes this three-point strategy for adoption:

  • Define the problem. Are you seeking to deliver consistent information to patients? Improve the efficiency of collaboration? Support connections between staff and practitioners?
  • Establish a method of measurement. What is the benchmark with the current solution? What are your objectives once your social technologies are in place?
  • Evaluate the main organizational requirements. Consider technology, operations and the culture of your audience.

Cullman Regional Medical Center’s award-winning Good to Go® program, launched in conjunction with ExperiaHealth™, is a winner on all three counts. Faced with the problem of many patients leaving the hospital without thoroughly understanding their discharge instructions, Cullman decided to train some of its staff to use an iPod Touch® to record providers giving their patients discharge instructions.

Patients and family (and soon providers) access the cloud-based recordings via the Internet or smart phone, cutting down on questions and misunderstandings about post-hospital care. Audio-only recordings are available via land line. The positive response was immediate: by dramatically improving this critical care transition, Good to Go has resulted in a 15 percent decline in readmission rates for patients who received recorded discharge instructions and a 58 percent increase in HCAHPS satisfaction scores.

The technology is simple. The program plugs into Cullman’s operations with a minimum of training and investment. The culture has embraced the practice — even older patients, who Cullman feared might be uncomfortable with the technology. Caregivers and family who don’t live nearby are pleased they can access and replay loved ones’ instructions. It also has the added benefit for staff members of providing a complete record of instructions given.

This simple, successful intervention is now being tested in other areas of the hospital as well.

“We started with 4 East, a 31-bed step down unit where all of our CHF, stroke and acute MI patients go,” explains Cheryl Bailey, vice president of patient care services at Cullman Regional Medical Center. “We knew if we could make a difference on 4East, and we could reduce readmissions, then we would be able to replicate that same process in other areas of the hospital.”

Good to Go has been rolled out to preadmission testing, one day surgery, and maternity — not so much to reduce readmissions, but to help improve the communication process, she explains. “We realized with preadmission testing and one day surgery, we often had patients calling back saying, ‘Now was I supposed to take this medicine before my surgery?” or even, ‘Where am I supposed to enter the hospital when I come for my surgery?’ or ‘What did you tell me about umbilical cord care for our baby?’ So we rolled the Good to Go solution to these areas.”

Cullman also uses the program in its emergency room, respiratory therapy, physical therapy, CPAP Care Center and patient financial services — any area where communication could be enhanced.

With a half a billion Americans expected to carry smartphones in a couple of years, mobile health’s capacity to help individuals manage and prevent disease and healthcare organizations to track outcomes is nearly limitless. However, some foresight and planning is advised to avoid flooding the healthare industry with useless apps and games.

Advice from 5-Star Medicare Advantage Plans: Engage Low-Performing Providers, Members

April 25th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Webinar Replay: Best Practice Approach to Improve CMS Star Quality Ratings

Medicare Advantage health plans in search of higher Star Quality Ratings should follow the lead of five-star MA plans, suggests Joe Johnson, vice president of L.E.K. Consulting.

Five-star best practices for improving all-important clinical performance markers include mailings and telephonic outreach to low-performing member cohorts, notes Johnson, as well as shared savings, profit-sharing goals and even provider report cards. The latter is likely to spur low-performing providers into aligning with health plan quality improvement efforts, which can help to raise ratings.

Provider engagement is critical, since the majority of the Star Quality Ratings' 37 measures, which span five domains, is influenced by the work done by providers, such as in closing gaps in care and managing chronic conditions, and are weighted most heavily by CMS. For example, the monitoring of care transitions to prevent readmissions is one area where five-star plans shine, he says.

During a recent webinar on A Strategic, Best Practice Approach to Improve CMS Star Quality Ratings, Johnson suggested MA plans map out an enterprise-wide Star Quality Ratings strategy to target improvement opportunities and identify the most addressable gaps in the organization — giving priority to those that will give the plan the most 'bang' for its buck.

Reimbursement for MA plans is tied in part to awarding of stars for patient care and satisfaction. Factoring in the bonus structure for high-performing plans, L.E.K Consulting estimates that moving from a three-star to four-star rating is roughly worth $50 PMPM — or $6 million in revenue per year for a 10,000-member plan.

Of the five domains in the Star Quality Ratings Program, management of chronic conditions is ripest for MA plan innovation and improvement, Johnson notes. Plans should identify the size and magnitude of conditions presenting in their member populations, and prioritize efforts based on potential for economic impact.

The designated "Star Czars" team (individuals spearheading the quality ratings improvement effort) should be cross-functional and analytical but also speak the requisite clinical language to inform and engage providers, advises Johnson.

Johnson also shared a half-dozen other strategies for Star Quality Ratings improvement from five-star plans, including benchmarking of local competitors, and examined some of the changes CMS is considering for 2014 and 2015 Star Quality Ratings.

Listen to an in-depth interview with Joe Johnson here.

Guest Post: Accountable Care as a Panacea

April 22nd, 2013 by Ally C. Evans

ACO

ACOs are testing ways to disrupt the high-cost culture of healthcare.

In the final post of a three-part series on "Accountable Care: The Power of Partnerships," guest blogger Ally C. Evans, healthcare consultant with Freed Associates, makes the case for ACOs as a solution.

Because ACOs are in a state of evolutionary fluidity, it is too early to know if they will cure our fragmented delivery system woes, but they certainly have potential. We know this because although the term 'ACO' is relatively new, the concept itself is not. The likes of Kaiser Permanente, the Mayo Clinic and the Cleveland Clinic have operated under the principles of integration, population health management and accountability for a long time. In fact, they are so good at it that they’re really more like Super ACOs. They have developed highly sophisticated, centralized practices, IT systems and care networks that connect patients to the right services at the right time to optimize outcomes, the patient experience and service utilization. As a result, they have emerged as some of the top healthcare brands in the country and provide best-practice examples to inform ACO strategy and tactical implementation.

The major benefits of ACOs are clear. Healthcare spending reductions will be driven by attempts to disrupt the high-cost culture associated with volume-based payment. Healthcare quality enhancements will leverage both preventive and reactive tactics to drive performance relative to quality benchmarks. Specifically, enhanced service integration and care coordination will ensure effective management of chronic conditions in low-cost primary care settings, minimizing demand for high-cost acute and ancillary services. If shared savings appropriately offset the revenue loss providers may experience due to efficient service utilization, more patients will receive the appropriate standard of care at a lower price. Although this concept doesn’t seem like rocket science, given the history and complexity in healthcare it’s nothing short of groundbreaking.

Of course, ACOs aren’t necessarily the right choice for every provider. There are inherent risks that will keep the ACO debate whirling around board rooms for some time, not the least of which are the risks associated with change burn-out, inequitable care (i.e. patients within an ACO get a higher standard of care than non-ACO patients), misalignment with organization strategy, revenue reduction, financial penalties tied to low performance, and up-front infrastructure investment. CMS is addressing the latter concern with their Advanced Payment ACO, which provides a proportion of projected shared savings up front for start-up costs.

A small but rapidly growing proportion of healthcare organizations have taken the ACO plunge, with a reported 221 operating across 45 states as of May 2012. These ACO early adopters have varying structures, with more than half being sponsored by hospital systems and just over one-third sponsored by physician groups.1 Specific to the Medicare ACO programs, 116 ACOs had joined the Shared Savings Program as of July 2012 with another cohort joining in January, 2013. An additional 32 ACOs are participating in the CMS Pioneer ACO Program, designed for more experienced and integrated organizations, and 20 are participating in the Advanced Payment ACO. The greater majority of CMS ACOs are physician-led.

If ACOs are successful on a large scale in this country, they will fundamentally alter our health system, underscoring the notion that high-quality care and responsible spending are the right thing to do. As a patient-centered approach, these programs have cost benefits that will eventually filter back to employers and patients, with reductions in health-insurance premiums and subsequent reductions in cost-driven avoidance of care and medication non-compliance.

Are ACOs the answer we’ve been waiting for, or another flavor of the month program waiting to fail? Based on the ethical, economic, and clinical potential, we think it is a significant step in the right direction.

References:

  1. Muhletein, D., et al. Growth and disperson of accountable care organizations: June 2012 update. Leavitt Partners, June 2012. Available online.

Read Part 1: Why Accountable Care Organizations?

Read Part 2: Accountable Care Reflects Paradigm Shift from Volume to Value.

Ally C. Evans is an industrial engineer specializing in process and system improvement in healthcare. Most recently, Ally has driven various initiatives in the Accountable Care arena, focusing on the design and implementation of ACO strategy and tactical interventions. She is a consultant with Freed Associates, a California-based healthcare consulting firm. Their work is to provide sustainable solutions that enable healthcare organization to improve patient care services reduce costs and increase operational efficiency.

HIN Disclaimer: The opinions, representations and statements made within this guest article are those of the author and not of the Healthcare Intelligence Network as a whole. Any copyright remains with the author and any liability with regard to infringement of intellectual property rights remain with them. The company accepts no liability for any errors, omissions or representations.

The Changing Role of Case Managers in Emerging Care Delivery Models

March 7th, 2013 by Cheryl Miller

"I know some case managers who left on Friday with one title, and came in on Monday with a different title!"

So says Teresa Treiger in the recent webinar The Role of Case Managers in Emerging Care Delivery Models sponsored by the Healthcare Intelligence Network.

A lively speaker with more than 30 years of healthcare industry and 20 years of care management experience, Ms. Treiger discussed the evolution of the case manager in the changing healthcare landscape. With the continued expansion of patient-centered medical homes and accountable care organizations, case managers are taking on a more standardized, collaborative approach to care coordination, she said, creating the need for broadened responsibilities.

Included in the change is the case manager's title, which seems to constantly be in flux. This stems from the wide ranging responsibilities of the case manager, and its ever changing job description.

The first step? “Case manager job titles need to be codified into a law so consumers know what they're getting,” Ms. Treiger says, and there needs to be “a set of standards that defines them, what they do, and what their titles are.”

Titles aside, the evolution of the case manager has been an extensive one, transforming from primarily a utilization management role to one involving readmissions avoidance initiatives.

“…The core functions of case management have remained and are consistent, but what’s important is some are shifting because of the changing work environments, the newer settings of care and different employers that case managers can work in. And while the past may have included a significant utilization management component, today we’re more focused on quality, including readmission avoidance type of initiatives.”

Much of those initiatives include care transition programs, long a primary responsibility of case managers. Given the recent explosion of such programs, case managers have the opportunity to step up, and they should, because patient discharges are muddled by too many people, Ms. Treiger says.

Integrative care is another area where case managers need to be educated, so they can not only address the patient-centered stance much of the healthcare industry is taking, but so they can be more patient-focused. Case managers need to apply both clinical and psychological care to their patients in order to truly benefit them.

As case managers continue to expand in the healthcare industry, on and off-site, the use of case manager extenders will be a "tremendous resource," she said, enabling case managers to focus on clinical issues.

But despite stepping up to more responsibility, case managers also need to realize that "There is no "I" in team." And in some venues, embedded care environments for one, they are still the newer kids on the block. To solidify and maintain their stance in the industry, they need to "show tangible results, show potential organizations how they can benefit them."

Infographic: Improving Care Transitions with Quality Improvement Organizations

February 18th, 2013 by Melanie Matthews

In communities where hospitals, other healthcare providers, and community services work together to coordinate evidence-based hospital discharges and provide better support in the community, hospital admissions and readmissions can be reduced.

Led by the Colorado Foundation for Medical Care (CFMC) as a national coordinator, 14 QIOs participated in a three-year project in which the QIOs convened medical, community, and social service providers and facilitated community-wide quality improvement activities to implement evidence-based improvements in patient care transitions.

The QIOs’ efforts included community organizing, technical assistance in implementing best practices, and monitoring of participation, implementation, effectiveness, and adverse effects. The program resulted in a 6 percent drop in hospitalizations and rehospitalizations, per 1,000 beneficiaries in the first two years. The average community netted about $3 million dollars in annual savings for Medicare. These findings were released by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in "Associations between quality improvement for care transitions in communities and rehospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries."

A new infographic illustrates the strategies used by the QIOs and results achieved.

Quality Improvement Organizations

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual
healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

You may also be interested in this related resource: Care Transitions Toolkit.

RWJ Forum on Reducing Readmissions: “Hospital Discharge is Tipping Point”

February 15th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Interdisciplinary care teams, including a transition navigator, are one key to reducing hospital readmissions and improving transitional care.

In the increasingly hot-button realm of reducing avoidable Medicare rehospitalizations, the handoff from hospital to home has become the tipping point, agreed expert panelists at this week's Care About Your Care forum presented by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

"The hospital discharge is either a moment where we can deliver great care, or we could fail," stated Nancy Snyderman, MD, NBC chief medical editor, who led the forum along with RWJF President and CEO Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, MD, MBA. The live event was designed to energize the national conversation about reducing hospital readmissions, the cost of which is estimated at about $30 billion a year.

"All patients need to have seamless journeys back to their communities after a hospitalization," said Dr. Lavizzo-Mourey in her opening remarks.

Of all the innovations in transitional care management presented during the 90-minute webcast, a novel idea emerged: ask the patient what they need.

That was one of the three opportunities for improving readmission rates identified by Eric Coleman, MD, who developed the popular Care Transitions Intervention® a template for transitional care. "We need to better engage patients and family members," he suggested, a tactic that can uncover specific issues that contribute to readmissions, such as lack of transportation or a burned-out caregiver.

Dr. Coleman also implored hospitals to recognize that causes of readmissions are very broad and often outside the scope of what hospitals can accomplish. "A hospital might not be able to address a patient's transportation issue, but an Office on Aging can."

Thirdly, communication and the exchange of health information need to improve, he said.

Another key to successful transitional care management is the spread of innovations and technologies and the adapting of interventions to fit a provider's need. "We need to make sure that the data tools, analytical tools, and decision support tools are used across the board," said panelist Mary Naylor, PhD, RN, of the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.

Dr. Naylor helped to implement the Transitional Care Model (TCM), another popular model that provides comprehensive in-hospital planning and home follow-up for chronically ill high-risk older adults hospitalized for common medical and surgical conditions.

Of course, all of these interventions come with a cost. Jonathan Blum, MA, of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) addressed the issue of reimbursement for transitional care, as well as the federal payor's new Readmissions Reduction Program. "While it's true we are focusing on readmissions, we are also helping hospitals to improve transitions. We are helping them to see what happens to patients beyond the four walls."

As far as payment, CMS is changing how Medicare pays for care, with new models like bundled payments, he said. "It's our job to set the standards and drive performance to meet that standard. We can provide best practices and share learnings."

Learnings were shared during the forum, in the form of winning submissions from RWJ's Transitions to Better Care Video Contest. More than 100 care teams around the country submitted videos detailing the innovative ways in which they are improving care transitions, defined by Dr. Coleman as "the movement patients make between healthcare practitioners and settings as their condition and care needs change during the course of a chronic or acute illness."

Among the innovations highlighted during the forum:

  • A Transition Navigator at the University of Utah Health Care in Salt Lake City who screens the list of patients admitted daily, interacting with the care team and following the patients all the way through post-discharge. The organization's use of a transition navigator has reduced readmissions by 23 percent.
  • Care team members at Cullman Regional Medical Center in Alabama use an iPod Touch to record a physician's discharge instructions in front of the patient, which the patients can later retrieve online. This tactic reduced rehospitalizations by 15 percent.
  • Mercy Health in Cincinnati, a self-proclaimed "hotbed of readmissions," began with six nurses and the four pillars of the Coleman model — medication management, prompt follow-up, a dynamic health record, and red flags and alerts — and added one of their own, working through barriers to regime adherence that were ratcheting up readmission rates. The end result was a reduction in hospital readmissions from 16.9 percent in 2011 to 14.5 percent in October 2012, with an estimated savings of $850,000.

The forum was also an opportunity for the foundation to publicize its latest report, The Revolving Door: A Report on U.S. Hospital Readmissions. The report found that despite the spotlight cast on this issue in recent years, readmission rates among Medicare beneficiaries remain virtually unchanged since 2008. For example:

One in eight Medicare patients were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of being released after surgery in 2010, while patients in the hospital for reasons other than surgery returned at an even higher rate of one in six.

Complicating the challenges of readmissions are individuals with mental health issues, as well as the elderly with advanced illness.

"Revolving door hospitalizations typically happen in the last years of life," said one audience member during the Q&A. "We must begin to have upfront conversations about death with patients long before we refer them to hospice."

Is Healthcare Getting the Most from Quality Improvement Organizations?

February 12th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

QIOs can help to support efforts to reduce Medicare readmissions.

Hospitalizations and readmissions were reduced by at least 6 percent in areas of the country where quality improvement organizations (QIOs) made concerted efforts to improve care transitions from hospitals to the home or other post-acute facilities, according to findings published last month in Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

The study shows that hospitalizations and rehospitalizations among Medicare patients declined nearly twice as much in communities where QIOs coordinated interventions that engaged whole communities to improve care than in comparison communities, according to a press release from Qualis Health, one of 14 state-based QIOs that acts as the QIO for Idaho and Washington. Prior to a 2012 regionalization effort, each state had its own QIO.

This encouraging data suggests that the CMS-funded QIOs may be underutilized for community-based care improvement and the reduction of avoidable healthcare costs. In a new HIN report on avoiding CMS readmissions penalties, Dr. Amy Boutwell proposes several ways in which healthcare organizations can partner with QIOs to shore up care transitions, thereby reducing the likelihood of readmissions.

"Groupings of hospitals and of post-acute providers in regional geographies help to improve care transitions and care coordination across settings," noted Dr. Boutwell, a physician and president of Collaborative Healthcare Strategies who also co-founded the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's STAAR (State Action on Avoidable Rehospitalizations) Initiative. "Take advantage of the wealth of other programs and incentives that are coming out of the federal government in this domain."

Request help from QIOs with data management, she suggests. Knowing one's own data as well as one's community partners are two essential steps in identifying weaknesses in care coordination efforts. "The QIO can run your data, which is especially helpful if you are an urban or a busy suburban market. They can show to you all of the transitions between your hospital and other settings of care that are Medicare providers, home health agencies and skilled nursing facilities.

"The QIO can also show you the frequency of transitions between all of these facilities as well as the directionality," Dr. Boutwell continues. "For example, are you sending out a lot of patients from your hospital to the post-acute and are they sending you back a lot of patients? Wherever those arrows are coming back to you would indicate a high strategic opportunity to engage with those post-acute providers and start talking about the importance of not sending the patient back if there is any way to possibly avoid it in a safe and appropriate manner."

Each state has a QIO under contract from CMS to help communities at their request improve their care transitions. The QIOs serve as the largest federal program dedicated specifically to improving healthcare quality at the community level.

Dr. Boutwell suggested some other federally funded programs that can provide assistance:

Infographic: Real World Strategies for Reducing Readmissions

December 12th, 2012 by Patricia Donovan

reducing readmissions

We've all seen the numbers on potentially avoidable Medicare readmissions, but new penalties from CMS for subpar readmission rates pack a little more punch into these often-published stats from CMS, the AHRQ, MedPac, and other sources. The hard truth is that more than 2,200 hospitals will lose a portion of their inpatient Medicare rates in FY 2013.

Proactive data analysis is one way to keep readmissions penalties at bay. And this new infographic from the Healthcare Intelligence Network consolidates the protocols and strategies many organizations are using to dramatically reduce the number of Medicare beneficiaries that return to the hospital within 30 days, drawing from responses from our annual Reducing Hospital Readmissions survey.

Among their ideas:

  • Follow-up appointments and phone contact shortly after discharge;
  • The use of transition coaches in hospitals, nursing homes and SNFs;
  • Group physical activity sessions that focus on physical, social and emotional well-being;
  • Upping use of telehealth and fall risk assessments.

We invite you to embed this infographic on your own Web site using the code that appears beneath it. Also, share it via your social media channels. A deeper dive into the latest trends to reduce hospital readmissions is reflected in 2012 Healthcare Benchmarks: Reducing Hospital Readmissions.

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics. Click here to sign up today.

Other Infographics from HIN:

10 Hallmarks of a Health-Literate Organization

August 23rd, 2012 by Jessica Fornarotto

Recorded Webinar: Patient Engagement in the Patient-Centered Medical Home — A Continuum Approach

Leadership committed to health literacy and easy access to health information are two attributes of an organizational environment that fosters health literacy, suggests a new study reported in the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

It is possible for a healthcare system to redesign its services to better educate patients in the handling of immediate health issues and also become more savvy consumers of medicine in the long run, says the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (SFGH) study. The study identified ten attributes that healthcare organizations should adopt to make it easier for people to better navigate health information, make sense of services and better manage their own health — assistance for which there is a profound societal need.

The ten attributes of a health-literate organization are:

  1. Has leadership that makes health literacy integral to its mission, structure and operations.

  2. Integrates health literacy into planning, evaluation measures, patient safety and quality improvement.
  3. Prepares the workforce to be health-literate and monitors progress.
  4. Includes populations served in the design, implementation, and evaluation of health information and services.
  5. Meets the needs of populations with a range of health literacy skills while avoiding stigmatization.
  6. Uses health literacy strategies in interpersonal communications and confirms understanding at all points of contact.
  7. Provides easy access to health information and services and navigation assistance.
  8. Designs and distributes print, audiovisual, and social media content that is easy to understand and act on.
  9. Addresses health literacy in high-risk situations, including care transitions and communications about medicines.
  10. Communicates clearly what health plans cover and what individuals will have to pay for services.

Some 77 million people in the United States have difficulty understanding very basic health information, which clouds their ability to follow doctors’ recommendations, and millions more lack the skills necessary to make clear, informed decisions about their own healthcare, said senior author Dean Schillinger, MD, a UCSF professor of medicine, chief of the Division of General Internal Medicine at SFGH, and director of the Health Communications Program the UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at SFGH. “Depending on how you define it, nearly half the U.S. population has poor health literacy skills. Over the last two decades, we have focused on what patients can do to improve their health literacy,” said Schillinger. “In this report, we looked at the other side of the health literacy coin, and focused on what healthcare systems can do.”

The importance of enhancing health literacy has been demonstrated by many clinical studies over the years, said Schillinger. Health literacy is linked directly to patient wellness. People who can understand their health information tend to make better choices, are able to self-manage their chronic conditions, and have better outcomes than people who do not.

Adults with low health literacy may find it difficult to navigate the healthcare system, and are more likely to have higher rates of medication errors, more ER visits and hospitalizations, gaps in their preventive care, increased likelihood of dying, and poorer health outcomes for their children.

Many health policy organizations have recognized that health literacy is not only important to people, but it can also benefit society because helping patients help themselves is a way to keep healthcare costs down. Successful self-management reduces disease complications, cuts down on unnecessary ER visits and eliminates other wasteful spending.

Click here for more information and for a complete description of the ten attributes.