Archive for the ‘Transitions in Care’ Category

Care Transitions Playbook Sets Transfer Rules for Post-Acute Network Members

July 28th, 2016 by Patricia Donovan

St. Vincent's Health Partners best practices care transitions playbook documents more than 140 patient transfer protocols.

St. Vincent's Health Partners best practices care transitions playbook documents more than 140 patient transfer protocols.

A primary tool for Saint Vincent’s Health Partners Post-Acute Network is a playbook documenting more than 140 transitions for patients traveling from one care setting to another, including the elements of each transition and ways network members should hold each other accountable during the move. Here, Colleen Swedberg, MSN, RN, CNL, director of care coordination and integration for St. Vincent’s Health Partners, explains the playbook's data collection process and information storage and describes a typical care transition entry.

The playbook is made up of several sections, including one with current expectations, based on the Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium, which we can review online. From an evidence-based point of view, they’ve listed the evidence for many common conditions patients are seen for in medical management. This is kept up to date. This is an electronic document stored on our Web site that can only be accessed by individuals subscribed to the network. We’ve also put this on flash drives for various partners.

A second section contains actual metrics for any network contracts. The metrics appear in such a way that the highest standard is included. For example, physician providers, as long as they provide the highest level of care in the metric, can be sure they’re meeting all the metrics. Those metrics are based on HEDIS® standards.

The third section is the transition section, laid out in two to three pages. For example, a patient moves from the hospital inpatient setting to a skilled nursing facility, such as Jewish Senior Services. For that transition, the playbook documents all the necessary tools for that patient: a personal health record, a medication list, whatever is needed. Also included is any communication with the primary care physician, if that provider has been identified. Finally, this section identifies the responsibility of the sending setting—in this case, the hospital inpatient staff. What do they need to organize and make sure they’ve done before the patient leaves and starts that transition, and what is the responsibility of the receiving organization?

That framework is the same for every transition: the content and tools change according to the particular transition. A final section of the playbook details all of the tools used for care transitions. For example, in our network, we’re just now working on the use of reviews for acute care transfers, which is an INTERACT (Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers) tool. In fact, many settings, including all of our SNFs, as it turns out historically, have used that tool. This tool is in the playbook, along with the reference and expectation of when that tool would be used.

Source: Post-Acute Care Trends: Cross-Setting Collaborations to Align Clinical Standards and Provider Demands

http://hin.3dcartstores.com/Post-Acute-Care-Trends-Cross-Setting-Collaborations-to-Align-Clinical-Standards-and-Provider-Demands_p_5149.html

Post-Acute Care Trends: Cross-Setting Collaborations to Align Clinical Standards and Provider Demands examines a collaboration between the first URAC-accredited clinically integrated network in the country and one of its partnering PAC providers to map out and enhance a patient's journey through the network continuum—drilling down to improve the quality of the transition from acute to post-acute care.

CCNC Home Visits in Transitional Care: Payoffs of Targeting Priority Patients

April 7th, 2016 by Patricia Donovan

Timely and appropriately targeted home visits for priority Medicaid beneficiaries significantly reduced hospital admissions and readmissions.

The philosophy behind Community Care of North Carolina's award-winning care transition management program is simple: transitional care works better for some than others.

Before investing in home visits, pharmacist involvement and early outpatient follow-up, healthcare organizations should discern the patients most likely to benefit from these resource-intensive interventions as well as those who won't, advised Carlos Jackson, PhD., CCNC director of program evaluation.

"Transitional care often becomes a one-size-fits-all intervention, where providers feel they have to do the same thing for everybody coming out of the hospital," Jackson noted during Measuring and Evaluating the Impact of Home Visits for Clinically Complex Patients, a March 2016 webinar now available for replay.

In outlining the CCNC approach, Jackson recommends transitional care be targeted towards patients with multiple, chronic or catastrophic conditions to optimize an organization's return on investment.

His organization's dexterity in determining and managing a priority population for transitional care (TC) helped to earn CCNC the inaugural Hearst Health Prize for Population Health earlier this year. With a presence in all one hundred North Carolina counties, CCNC manages 1.5 million Medicaid beneficiaries, among other populations.

Statistically, CCNC determined that only a quarter of its Medicaid discharges were likely to meaningfully benefit from transitional care, and that even within that priority population, only a smaller segment would benefit meaningfully from resource-heavy interventions.

Of all face-to-face encounters with CCNC priority patients, include hospital bedside and office visits, appropriately targeted home visits reduced this population's likelihood of being readmitted to the hospital most significantly, noted Jackson.

"Of course, you can't do a home visit with everybody. If you want a positive return on investment to cover the cost of the home visit, you need to focus on the highest risk patients."

Modeled on the Coleman Transitions Intervention Model®, the eight-year-old CCNC program has elements common to many transitional care initiatives—data analytics, embedded care management, telephonic and face-to-face follow-up. But CCNC has reexamined some traditional transitional care tenets, such as the notion that this type of care is necessary for all.

"Actually, most patients don't benefit," Jackson noted. "Lower risk patients don't benefit. The evidence for benefit is much weaker if you are not one of these high risk, multiple chronic patients."

His organization has also widened its transitional care lens beyond a focus on reducing readmissions. "It's sometimes myopic to focus on just serving the 30-day readmissions," Jackson continued. "If you can deliver good transitional care, you can keep them out of the hospital for a very long time and affect their outcomes way into the future."

The CCNC transitional care approach for North Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions resulted in more than 2,200 fewer readmissions and 8,000 fewer inpatient admissions in 2014 as compared to 2008, Jackson concluded.

The Care Plan Process: 15 Trends to Know

January 21st, 2016 by Patricia Donovan

Care planning begins with a needs assessment, say the majority of respondents to HIN's 2015 survey on Care Plans.

The use of care plans increases medication adherence, patient self-management and clinical quality ratings, say 70 percent of healthcare organizations engaged in care planning, according to newly published market metrics from the Healthcare Intelligence Network (HIN).

A majority of respondents—83 percent—incorporate care plans into value-based healthcare delivery systems, according to HIN's December 2015 survey, with more than half of remaining organizations planning to do so in the coming year.

High-risk health indicators derived from health risk assessments or the imminent transition of a patient from one care site to another are the chief triggers of the care planning process, said survey respondents.

Survey Highlights:

Other findings from HIN's Care Plans survey include the following:

  • First and foremost in a care plan strategy is an assessment of needs, say 87 percent of respondents.
  • The electronic health record is the care plan maintenance and distribution tool of choice for almost two-thirds of respondents, although the retention of paper records is reported by nearly half of responding companies.
  • The principal criterion for classifying patients in need of care plans is the data derived from health risk assessments (HRAs), say nearly two-thirds of respondents, but patients transitioning between care sites also are prioritized for care planning, note 61 percent.
  • The presence of a behavioral health condition poses the greatest challenge to care planning by a large margin, said 39 percent of respondents, as compared to diagnosis of physical health problems.
  • The typical tracking time for care plans ranged from one to two months, said 24 percent, while adherence to care plans is checked monthly by 37 percent of respondents.
  • Patient engagement is the most significant barrier to care plan success, say 44 percent of respondents.
  • Patients’ healthcare utilization patterns are the most reliable indicators of care plan adherence, say 29 percent.
  • About 13 percent report ROI from care planning efforts as between 2:1 and 3:1.

Download a complimentary executive summary of 2016 Care Plan metrics to learn the value of evidence-based care plans in following high-risk patients through health episodes and transitions of care.

Guest Post: 7 Ideas to Improve Communication and Coordination between Care Sites

September 22nd, 2015 by Richard A. Royer, CEO, Primaris

With access to some of the most highly educated and trained medical professionals in the world, providing Americans with the best patient care possible should be simple. Unfortunately, that’s not often the case. Poor communication between specialists, duplicate tests and unnecessary procedures are frequently the norm rather than the exception, leading to costly, dangerous and sometimes deadly consequences. With so many specialists and resources readily on hand, how is this happening?

The problem is a lack of care coordination. Simply put, care coordination is the idea that all specialists treating a patient should communicate and share information to ensure that everyone acts as a team to meet patient needs. This includes reporting all results back to a primary care practice or to someone coordinating patient care, and ensuring that labs, specialists, hospitals, and long-term care facilities work together to communicate information quickly and appropriately. It’s about primary care physicians, nurses, technicians, specialists, and caregivers collaborating on patient care rather than working as separate entities.

The average Medicare beneficiary interacts with seven physicians in four different practices during a single year, according to the New England Journal of Medicine. For those with chronic conditions, the numbers can be even higher. And, nearly one-fifth of Medicare patients who are hospitalized are readmitted within 30 days of discharge, and 75 percent of these readmissions could have been prevented by improved care coordination.

Too often, patients discharged from hospitals don’t get the support and encouragement they need to take their medicine, follow their diets, and adhere to the regimens doctors have prescribed during their stay. Many of these problems can be solved by improving care coordination, and that starts with communication between care sites.

Here are seven suggestions for improving communication between care sites—as well as across the care continuum:

  • Start the dialog: As a rule of thumb, improving communication between care sites begins with healthcare providers asking themselves what they know that others need to know, and sharing that information with the patient’s care team. What do patients need to know when they’re referred to a specialist? What do the specialists that patients are being referred to need to be aware of, e.g. what tests have already been completed? Has the primary care physician been informed?
  • Create a team and make it accountable: Organizations should start by assigning a team of people to be accountable for managing patient care. Define the extent of their responsibilities for key activities such as following up on test results and communicating information to other physicians. Establish when specific responsibilities should be transferred to other care providers—whether that means specialty physicians, long-term care facilities, or home care providers.
  • Designate care coordinators: Designate staff that will act specifically as care coordinators can help to reduce hospital readmissions. Before patients leave the hospital, care coordinators should meet with them to make sure they understand the treatment plans they need to follow at home as well as any changes to their medication regimens. The hospital care coordinators also must follow up on any pending labs and imaging studies and contact primary care physicians to communicate updated medications, treatment plans, and test results for their patients. The likelihood of readmission drops significantly when patients leave with a clear understanding of their treatment plans and when their primary care physicians know what is necessary during follow-up care.

    This same communication protocol should also apply to patients who leave the hospital for long-term care facilities. In this instance, the hospital care coordinator should communicate discharge instructions to the long-term care staff. As soon as residents return to the long-term care facility, staff there should meet with residents to review their discharge instructions, answer their questions, and communicate with the hospital if any further clarification is needed. Long-term care staff should also follow up regularly with these residents to ensure they continue to comply with instructions the doctor has recommended and intervene if any problems arise.

  • Standardize communication processes: Create a protocol for filling out patient charts in a standard way so they are easy to interpret and key elements aren’t overlooked. You also should standardize communication by using structured forms to ensure primary care providers, specialists, and long-term care providers all have the same and necessary information.
  • Develop a referral tracking system: Creating a system to internally track and manage referrals and transitions— including consultations with specialists, hospitalizations and ER visits, and referrals to community agencies—can go a long way towards improving communication between care sites. It will help to ensure patients are well prepared for their referral visit and know what to expect afterwards. And, it simplifies follow-up with referral providers about findings, next steps and treatment plans.
  • Follow up on referrals: When a primary care physician refers a patient to a specialist, for example, office staff should follow up to make sure the appointment was made and completed. In addition, office staff needs to ensure the specialist shares his findings with the primary care physician so he can be well versed on the patient's progress and any additional steps to be taken.
  • Notify providers in the patient's medical neighborhood: Similarly, when patients visit the emergency room or are admitted to the hospital, communication should be a priority. In this instance, hospital staff should notify the primary care practice so the primary care doctor can follow the patient’s progress through discharge and institute a care plan to prevent future admissions. In addition, the practice can reach out to patients when they leave the hospital to make sure they understand discharge instructions and schedule follow-up appointments. When the patient comes in for follow-up care, the primary care physician should have a complete history of specialists seen during the hospital admission, their recommendations, and tests performed, along with the results.

The healthcare industry can no longer simply “discharge” patients. Providers must now work collaboratively with all others across the continuum of care to transition and coordinate the ongoing care of every patient. That’s what care coordination is all about.


Richard Royer

About the Author: Richard A. Royer has served as the chief executive officer of Primaris since 2001. He has extensive administrative healthcare experience and is actively involved in several statewide healthcare initiatives. In 2006 he was appointed by the Missouri governor to the Missouri Healthcare Information Technology Task Force and chaired the resources workgroup. He also serves on the board of directors as treasurer for the Excellence in Missouri Foundation. In his over 35 years of medical business experience he has held positions as chief executive officer at Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, General Hospital; executive director of Columbia Regional Hospital in Missouri; and founder and president of Avalon Enterprises, a medical financial consulting firm.

HIN Disclaimer: The opinions, representations and statements made within this guest article are those of the author and not of the Healthcare Intelligence Network as a whole. Any copyright remains with the author and any liability with regard to infringement of intellectual property rights remain with them. The company accepts no liability for any errors, omissions or representations.

5 Reasons for Post-Acute Care to Participate in Bundled Payments

September 1st, 2015 by Patricia Donovan

Bundled payment participation put Brooks Rehabilitation on the forefront of healthcare payment reform.


Having completed more than 1,000 bundled episodes for total hip replacements, total knee replacements and hip fractures, Brooks Rehabilitation has achieved significant savings through Model 3 of the CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Model 3. Here, Debbie Reber, MHS, OTR, vice president of clinical services for Brooks Rehabilitation, explains Brooks' rationale for participating in episode-based payment models.

Why would post-acute care be responsible for bundled payments, as opposed to the acute care provider? When CMS's original bundles came out, it looked as though they would all be driven by acute care providers. At the time that Brooks jumped in, there was not a lot of information on what our opportunity would be or how this model was going to look. To explain our rationale for jumping into bundled payments, Brooks decided it was going to participate in order to be on the forefront of learning more about payment reform. We wanted to look at how post-acute care providers could help make some of the healthcare policy changes related to the future of healthcare reimbursement.

Second, we also really wanted to serve as a catalyst for a business to begin working better as a system of care. With all of our different divisions and the way our care settings are spread over the various counties that we serve, sometimes it was difficult for us to work as a united, seamless system. We thought moving to bundled payments offered a great opportunity for us to work better as a system of care, improve our care transitions, and improve our continuum.

Third, the other huge opportunity with bundled payment is the chance to experiment with clinical redesign. We approached bundled payments as having a blank slate: we could redesign the care to look and feel however we wanted it to be. If we could do things all over again, what were the tasks or gaps or cracks in our clinical care that we could really improve upon?

Fourth, we knew we wanted to have a strong voice regarding future policy and payment reform changes. And finally, we wanted to show that, in addition to key providers, Brooks was sophisticated enough to take risk and play a primary role with that continuum of care.

Source: Bundled Payments for Post-Acute Care: Profiting from Alternative Payments and Clinical Redesign

post-acute care bundled payments

Bundled Payments for Post-Acute Care: Profiting from Alternative Payments and Clinical Redesign shares the inside details of Brooks' Complete Care program and the resulting, significant savings Brooks achieved through CMS's BPCI Model 3, which is limited to retrospective post-acute care (PAC) for select diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).

5 Drivers of San Francisco Care Transitions ‘Clearinghouse’

June 18th, 2015 by Patricia Donovan

The sole public safety net hospital in the city, San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) serves a diverse population, of which 30 percent are uninsured. Here, Michelle Schneidermann, MD, outlines five factors that make care transitions challenging for SFGH patients and that helped to drive creation of a Care Transitions Task Force.

On any given day, around 8 to 10 percent of our inpatients are considered to be homeless. This is a population that is generally at higher than average risk for readmission stemming from a variety of factors. These include social determinants of health, like poverty and housing instability, comorbidity such as mental illness and substance use, and limited access to services in the face of complex care needs.

For the past ten years or so, there have been varied but somewhat siloed efforts to reduce post-discharge adverse events and improve the quality and safety of care transitions. In early 2012, as we approached the onset of Medicare’s readmission penalties, we had a coming-late-to-the-party-’aha’ moment, where we recognized the need to tackle care transitions and readmissions in a more structured and coordinated way.

Specifically, we recognized the need to create a comprehensive care transitions program to provide patients with the proper care and tools to stay out of the hospital. We needed to bridge those varied siloed programs by connecting them. Also, we wanted to provide a centralized clearinghouse or access point of information for the network on care transitions, and standardize and improve processes of care.

We decided, in retrospect, somewhat arbitrarily, that our aim would be to reduce readmissions by 15 percent over two years. These unmet goals led us to charter the San Francisco Health Network Care Transitions Task Force in the fall of 2012.

Source: Data-Driven Care Transition Management: Action Plans for High-Risk Patients

care transitions

Dr. Michelle Schneidermann completed her primary care internal medicine training at UCSF and joined the UCSF faculty in 2003, where she is a member of the Division of Hospital Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH). Through her inpatient clinical work and work with ambulatory programs, she has been able to directly witness the successes and challenges of patients’ transitions and generate feedback to the providers and systems that manage their care.

At SFGH, Dr. Schneidermann leads the Care Transitions Task Force, a cross-continuum, multidisciplinary team charged with improving the quality and safety of care transitions as well as reducing preventable readmissions.

One-Fourth Operate Post-Discharge Clinics to Curb Hospital, Post-Acute Readmissions

June 4th, 2015 by Patricia Donovan

Dedicated post-discharge clinics address medication concerns so high-risk patients don't end up back in the hospital.


Almost one-quarter of healthcare organizations—24 percent—operate dedicated post-discharge clinics for patients recently discharged from the hospital, nursing home or ED, according to the April 2015 Care Transitions Management survey by the Healthcare Intelligence Network.

A post-discharge clinic is designed to address issues related to a patient's recent hospitalization and ensure that the individual's transition from hospital or post-acute facility to their primary care doctor is smooth.

In a 2014 presentation, Torrance Memorial Health System described the typical operation of its follow-up clinic, the Coordinated Care Center, which is focused on medication management, a key driver of avoidable hospital readmissions. The health system stressed that the clinic is not a replacement for follow-up primary care following a hospitalization:

“One tactic [for reducing readmissions] is to encourage each of our patients going home from the hospital and SNF to make an appointment at our post-acute clinic with the physician who does medication reconciliation. She asks the patients to bring in all the medications they were on before they went to the hospital and all those prescribed at the hospital.

"They then have a 45-minute conversation, discussing medication plans moving forward, which ones they should take and which they shouldn’t, making sure with teach-back methodology the patient has a clear understanding of expectations in terms of consuming medication once they return home later that day. Those appointments normally take place within the last 72 hours.”

A dedicated post-discharge clinic is one way to plug glaring gaps in care transition management: insufficient follow-up. More work is needed during the actual patient handoff to break down the top barrier to smooth care transitions identified by HIN's fourth annual care transitions management assessment: communications between care sites.

Source: 2015 Healthcare Benchmarks: Care Transitions Management

Care Transition Management

2015 Healthcare Benchmarks: Care Transitions Management HIN's fourth annual analysis of these cross-continuum initiatives examines programs, models, protocols and results associated with movement of patients from one care site to another, including the impact of care transitions management on quality metrics and the delivery of value-based care.

Remote Care Management: Self-Monitoring Enhances Care Transitions

May 14th, 2015 by Patricia Donovan

Encouraged by reductions in hospital readmissions and almost universal patient satisfaction from its small remote patient monitoring pilot, CHRISTUS Health scaled up the initiative to more 170 participants. Luke Webster, MD, vice president and chief medical information officer for CHRISTUS Health, and Shannon Clifton, CHRISTUS director of connected care, describe the patient's responsibility in remote monitoring.

During the daily monitoring portion, the patient will do the daily self-care tasks. That includes their biometric readings, and answering questions related to their care plan, such as, how did they feel that day? Did they sleep well? Are they able to ambulate and get through their day normally or in good health? As long as they stay within those normal parameters, they will continue on with the daily monitoring and self-help management as they go.

Most patients monitor themselves in the morning, within 30 minutes of waking up. Some are directed to monitor themselves throughout the day depending on their risk: whether they’re low, medium, or moderate to high risk. That’s determined ahead of time by the nurse coach and/or the physician.

If for some reason there is an alert—such as a two- to three-pound weight gain, the patient’s not feeling well, or ran out of their prescription—any of those cues will alert the nurse that something has fallen outside that patient’s wellness parameters and their care plan. The nurse coach, at that time, will review all of the data; then the patient is called and the nurse coach will coach the patient back to their care plan.

We’ve had great success with that process; having all of that data has made the care transitions program more efficient, especially because the nurse coach has access to that day-to-day information; whereas before, our care transition program consisted of the nurse calling up to five times within 30 days.

Source: Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Condition Management: Leveraging Technology in a Value-Based System

remote monitoring

Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Condition Management: Leveraging Technology in a Value-Based System chronicles the evolution of a remote patient monitoring pilot by CHRISTUS Health. This 25-page report reviews the multi-state and international integrated delivery network's impressive early returns in cost of care, 30-day readmission rates and patient satisfaction from remote patient monitoring, as well as the challenges of program expansion.

Post-Discharge Home Visits, SNF Visits Halve Readmissions for High-Risk Population

April 27th, 2015 by Patricia Donovan

In an Ohio care transitions management initiative, post-discharge home or SNF visits to Medicare beneficiaries at high risk for readmission have helped to curb rehospitalizations by nearly 50 percent.

As one of CMS' Community-based Care Transitions Program (CCTP) demonstration projects, field coaches for the Council on Aging (COA) of Southwestern Ohio conduct home visits for high-risk Medicare fee-for-service patients in nine partner hospitals, explained Danielle Amrine, the COA's transitional care business manager during an April 2015 webinar, Home Visits: Five Pillars to Reduce Readmissions and Empower High-Risk Patients, now available for replay.

The COA of Southwestern Ohio completed 10,202 home visits from June 2012 through 2014, Ms. Amrine said. "The national readmission rate is around 21.3 percent. Those patients involved in our CCTP program experienced a readmission rate of 10.48 percent."

Home visits occur within 24 to 72 hours of a patient's discharge from the hospital; SNF visits within 10 days, to allow the patient to settle in at the SNF. For SNF visits, made to the top 10 nursing facilities where patients most often discharged, field coaches utilize the LACE readmissions tool to assess the need for a home visit post-discharge.

The intervention is designed to empower patients of any age and their caregivers to assert a more active role during their care transition.

Reinforced by a trio of follow-up phone calls, a typical home visit lasts about one hour. While geared to the patient's needs, the visit always covers the crucial medication reconciliation, which allows the coach not only to assess the patient's role in managing their medication regimen but also to identify any medication discrepancies. Medication misunderstandings are particularly common during transitions in care.

In a recent month, COA coaches identified 77 medication discrepancy issues, which, once resolved, resulted in only four of these patients from being readmitted back to the hospital.

The Southwestern Ohio program, the second in the nation to be funded by CMS to conduct home visits, is modeled on the four pillars of Eric Coleman's Care Transitions Intervention®. However, the COA has added a fifth pillar, community services, to connect patients to the COA's broad range of in-house and community-based services during the critical transition between providers or care sites.

The program relies heavily on personal health records (PHRs) to facilitate cross-site communication and ensure continuity of care data across practitioners and settings.

Success from the COA care transitions initiative also extends to emergency department utilization by this population: the national average baseline is around 11.6 percent, and CCTP participants show an admission rate of 9.39 percent, Ms. Amrine added.

About 15 percent of scheduled home visits do not occur; the program has created a number of strategies to address this falloff.

Future enhancements by the COA of Southwestern Ohio program include a behavioral health intervention and a pilot in which University of Cincinnati College of Pharmacy interns will reconcile medications via Skype® or other telemedicine application.

Home Health on Care Transitions Management: Focus on Post-Acute to Home Handoff

April 7th, 2015 by Patricia Donovan

With the hospital-to-home care transition deemed the most critical by half of healthcare organizations, home health sits on the front lines of care transitions management.

An overwhelming majority of home health organizations, which comprised approximately 10 percent of respondents to HIN's 2015 survey on Care Transitions Management, have a care transition management program in place: 80 percent versus 67 percent overall, and of those that don’t, 100 percent intend to implement one in the next 12 months, versus 56 percent overall.

Contrary to overall respondents, this sector considers the hospital to post-acute care transition key (50 percent versus 24 percent overall) as well as the post-acute care to home handoff (50 percent versus 9 percent overall).

Heart failure is the top health condition targeted by home health organizations (87 percent of respondents, versus 81 percent overall). This sector also targets acute myocardial infarction, or AMI (62 percent versus 51 percent overall), and the frail elderly, a top concern for 75 percent of this sector versus 44 percent overall.

Half of home health organizations surveyed self-developed care transitions programs (50 percent versus 34 percent overall). Similarly to most respondents, programs include medication reconciliation (87 percent versus 75 percent overall) and transition/handoff training (87 percent versus 39 percent overall). This sector also relied on telephonic follow-up (87 percent 79 percent overall) in their care transition programs.

Transition coaches were primarily responsible for coordinating care transitions, according to 37 percent of home health respondents, versus 25 percent overall.

Some ways home health organizations improved transitions of care included creation of community partnerships with acute care facilities, development of post-acute networks, and collaborations with all clinical and hospice providers.

Successful strategies for this sector included separating data input from hands-on patient discharge paperwork so clinicians doing the transition could focus more on the patient, and not typing. Also, maintaining open communication with all staff and following up on communication with the patient and/or caregiver to ensure they transitioned appropriately into the new setting helped them to identify any concerns in the hopes of avoiding an unnecessary hospitalization.

Provider engagement remains the biggest challenge to this sector’s transition management efforts, say 37 percent of home health organizations, versus 13 percent overall.

Source: 2015 Healthcare Benchmarks: Care Transitions Management

http://hin.3dcartstores.com/Chronic-Care-Management-Reimbursement-Compliance-Physician-Requirements-for-Value-Based-Revenue_p_5027.html

2015 Healthcare Benchmarks: Care Transitions Management HIN's fourth annual analysis of these cross-continuum initiatives examines programs, models, protocols and results associated with movement of patients from one care site to another, including the impact of care transitions management on quality metrics and delivery of value-based care.