Archive for the ‘Telehealth & Telemedicine’ Category

Ideas to Ease Challenges of Mobile Health Adoption

May 10th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Many older patients are adept at mobile health technologies.

With the average worker accessing information via three or more mobile devices — laptop, tablet and phone — it stands to reason that 45 percent of this year’s Mobile Health respondents now offer smart phone apps, text messaging and mobile Web applications to engage and educate “three-screeners.”

But just because the healthcare industry has launched headlong into social business strategies hinging on mHealth technologies does not mean that all strategies are successful. Growing pains from early mHealth adoption include the challenges of cost, interoperability and infrastructure — not to mention the difficulty of measuring mHealth’s impact on cost and utilization, a concern noted by more than 60 percent of the 150 respondents to HIN's inaugural survey on Mobile Health trends.

Before jumping into mobile, social and cloud solutions, Andrew Dixon, senior vice president of marketing and operations, Igloo Software, proposes this three-point strategy for adoption:

  • Define the problem. Are you seeking to deliver consistent information to patients? Improve the efficiency of collaboration? Support connections between staff and practitioners?
  • Establish a method of measurement. What is the benchmark with the current solution? What are your objectives once your social technologies are in place?
  • Evaluate the main organizational requirements. Consider technology, operations and the culture of your audience.

Cullman Regional Medical Center’s award-winning Good to Go® program, launched in conjunction with ExperiaHealth™, is a winner on all three counts. Faced with the problem of many patients leaving the hospital without thoroughly understanding their discharge instructions, Cullman decided to train some of its staff to use an iPod Touch® to record providers giving their patients discharge instructions.

Patients and family (and soon providers) access the cloud-based recordings via the Internet or smart phone, cutting down on questions and misunderstandings about post-hospital care. Audio-only recordings are available via land line. The positive response was immediate: by dramatically improving this critical care transition, Good to Go has resulted in a 15 percent decline in readmission rates for patients who received recorded discharge instructions and a 58 percent increase in HCAHPS satisfaction scores.

The technology is simple. The program plugs into Cullman’s operations with a minimum of training and investment. The culture has embraced the practice — even older patients, who Cullman feared might be uncomfortable with the technology. Caregivers and family who don’t live nearby are pleased they can access and replay loved ones’ instructions. It also has the added benefit for staff members of providing a complete record of instructions given.

This simple, successful intervention is now being tested in other areas of the hospital as well.

“We started with 4 East, a 31-bed step down unit where all of our CHF, stroke and acute MI patients go,” explains Cheryl Bailey, vice president of patient care services at Cullman Regional Medical Center. “We knew if we could make a difference on 4East, and we could reduce readmissions, then we would be able to replicate that same process in other areas of the hospital.”

Good to Go has been rolled out to preadmission testing, one day surgery, and maternity — not so much to reduce readmissions, but to help improve the communication process, she explains. “We realized with preadmission testing and one day surgery, we often had patients calling back saying, ‘Now was I supposed to take this medicine before my surgery?” or even, ‘Where am I supposed to enter the hospital when I come for my surgery?’ or ‘What did you tell me about umbilical cord care for our baby?’ So we rolled the Good to Go solution to these areas.”

Cullman also uses the program in its emergency room, respiratory therapy, physical therapy, CPAP Care Center and patient financial services — any area where communication could be enhanced.

With a half a billion Americans expected to carry smartphones in a couple of years, mobile health’s capacity to help individuals manage and prevent disease and healthcare organizations to track outcomes is nearly limitless. However, some foresight and planning is advised to avoid flooding the healthare industry with useless apps and games.

Infographic: The Future of HealthTech

March 25th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Whether through exercise, healthy eating habits, or routine checkups, daily healthcare decisions have a direct impact on the future of healthcare investing. With the demand for quality healthcare steadily rising, innovations in healthtech are encouraging investors to take a closer look at the role this sector will play in the future of healthcare, as shown in this infographic from SecondMarkets. The infographic depicts consumer demand for healthtech, which cities are hotspots for healthtech investing, and more.

Future of HealthTech

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

You may also be interested in this related resource: Electronic Health Records: Strategies for Long-Term Success.

Infographic: Digital Impact on the Healthcare Customer Experience

March 14th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Results of a new Global Customer Experience Report from Cisco found that 74 percent of consumers are open to a virtual doctor visit. The survey studied the views of consumers and healthcare decision-makers (HCDMs) on sharing personal health data, participating in in-person medical consultation versus remote care and using technology to make recommendations on personal health.

Other areas covered in the report include the role of the Internet in healthcare and the most trusted sources of healthcare information. Overall, the data indicate on healthcare demonstrate a shift in consumer attitudes toward personal data, telemedicine and access to medical information.

Digital Impact on Healthcare Customer Experience

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

You may also be interested in this related resource: Transforming Health Care: The Financial Impact of Technology, Electronic Tools and Data Mining.

Q&A: Predicting 2013 Healthcare Trends

January 29th, 2013 by Jessica Fornarotto

“There will be a significant investment in EHRs in 2013,” predicts Dennis Eder, managing director of Strategic Health Group. Eder also expects there will be more physician-run ACOs in 2013 compared to 2012.

Prior to their presentations during an October webinar on Healthcare Trends & Forecasts in 2013: A Strategic Planning Session, Eder, along with Hank Osowski, managing director of Strategic Health Group, and Steven Valentine, president of The Camden Group, shared the changes they see coming in 2013 for the healthcare industry, including future payment models, ACO administration, and demands for services.

HIN: Physician payment models are getting a lot of retooling — from the addition of pay for performance incentives for hitting quality metrics to care coordination payments for patients and members in medical homes. Is this going to change much in 2013? Are we going to see a shift toward shared savings or another payment model in the coming year?

(Hank Osowksi): Watching the trends over the last year or two and many of the innovations that are being tried, the industry is moving toward value-based purchasing and population risk-based purchasing. We think this is going to accelerate as we look at 2013, 2014 and beyond.

(Dennis Eder): I would agree with Hank. We believe with the events of 2012 and the significant interest in ACO participation, it will mature and continue into the future.

HIN: In comparing some results from our 2011 and 2012 surveys on accountable care organizations, we noticed a sizeable shift in ACO administration from hospital-run to physician-administered. Why do you think so many hospitals backed away from this role when the ACO model seemed so promising?

(Dennis Eder): One of the reasons we think this may be occurring is that hospitals administering ACOs is not part of their core competency. Many of the characteristics of an ACO are a health plan or a management service organization (MSO). And this is not what hospitals do, for the most part. In addition, hospital margins are thin, and have even become thinner, so any overhead that they can offload is a good thing. Physician organizations do this and they’re the ones who are responsible for the medical management and other care management in an ACO. I think it makes logical sense to have the physician organization take on more of an administrative role for an ACO.

(Hank Osowski): I think the point Dennis made is critically important. It is the physician organization that is controlling the array of services that the beneficiary is receiving. It makes sense for them to take a lead in running an ACO. They are the ones who best understand how all the pieces fit together and where the opportunities are to get efficiencies to improve quality and reduce the costs of care.

HIN: The IOM has recommended better and shared use of health data, particularly at the point of care, where key health decisions are made. What will be the technology to invest in or embrace in 2013 to improve data analytics for population health management?

(Dennis Eder): We’re going to continue to see a significant investment in EHRs. We know that it’s an important tool in some health plans. Kaiser, for example, is gaining significant market share. We see further investments in that particular area.

(Hank Osowski): It’s also important to take a self-examination of us as an industry. We have mountains of data. We have very little intelligence about where the value is in our system. Where can we leverage the most efficient of the care providers and change some of the things that are inefficient, that don’t contribute to high quality care and that drive up the costs? It’s digging into that mountain of data and pulling out the real healthcare intelligence that we as a system, and as an industry, can use to provide better care to patients.

HIN: What's ahead for population health management?

(Steven Valentine): We will begin to see more fierce competition, if you will, around population health management. People are going to try to concur and grab more populations to work with in their delivery systems. We’re expecting that we should have slightly soft demands for services. We would find that even with the population getting older, and with these new delivery systems and lower utilization rates, we don’t expect to see an uptick in volume — stable to a slight decline — which means you have to reduce your expenses and go after an additional market share population.

Infographic: Envisioning the Future of Health Technology

January 9th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Over time, technology raises lowest common denominators by reducing costs and connecting people across the world. Medical technology is no exception to this trend: previously siloed repositories of information and expensive diagnostic methods are rapidly finding a global reach and enabling both patients and practitioners to make better use of information.

This infographic from Envisioning Technology is an exercise in speculating about which individual technologies are likely to affect the scenario of health in the coming decades. Arranged in six broad areas, the forecast covers a multitude of research and developments that are likely to disrupt the future of healthcare: augmentation, regeneration, diagnostics, telemedicine, treatments and biogerentology.

future of health IT

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

Guest Post: Healthcare Management Enters 21st Century via EMR, Point of Care Technology

September 17th, 2012 by Cheryl Jacque

In today’s post, guest blogger Cheryl Jacque tackles the pros and cons of implementing electronic medical records (EMRs) and point-of-care technology and whether or not they can improve efficiency of patient care without increasing costs to patients. A recent Healthcare Intelligence Network post about the most effective ACO tools and policies supports Cheryl’s claim that despite high initial costs, EMRs and point-of-care technology benefit patients and healthcare providers alike.

The recently upheld Affordable Care Act has been the subject of contentious political debate for the past few years in the United States, and for good reason. By 2019, the annual cost of healthcare is expected to balloon to almost $4.7 billion, or 20.9 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Though the United States spends more on healthcare than nearly any other industrialized nation, the quality of care often suffers for many, and millions remain uninsured. However, as healthcare management adjusts to a rapidly changing world, many health professionals are not looking to government for improved care and reduced costs, but to technology. Recent advancements like EMRs and point-of-care technologies could expedite care and dramatically decrease costs, perhaps having a more dramatic effect on healthcare than any legislation ever could.

For most Americans, medical data is not confined to one place. General physician check-ups, emergency room visits, even dentistry and orthodontic records are all kept at their respective facility data storage rooms. While hard copies of data will still be kept, EMRs store all of a patient's medical data in a digital cloud, allowing medical professionals to immediately access and acquire important data from multiple sources and build a more complete and accurate portrait of an individual's health. “(EMRs help) doctors assess the patient's status and see exactly how the patient is performing,” said C. Martin Harris, chairman of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation's technology division, in a 2011 U.S. News and World Report article. “And this information is available in real time.” Having medical records available to multiple specialists can also substantially limit the number of errors on records, and the chance of someone catching a mistake is increased substantially.

While EMR technology offers some clear benefits, opponents point to implementation costs of about $20,000 per physician, initially, nearly 100 percent more than most facilities anticipate, according to a 2011 report by Accenture, and lead to an IT operating cost increase of 80 percent. However, the report suggests that more effective EMR implementation can be achieved by designating a chief medical informatics officer to serve as a bridge between the healthcare IT organization and the hospital's clinical and business operations.

While EMRs may eventually streamline and connect all of healthcare, information technology at the point of care has provided the most immediate benefit to patients and pharmaceutical companies. Improved payor data sets have rapidly increased the availability of real-world data in healthcare. Both patients and pharmaceutical regulators are anxiously awaiting the impact of this data, with a hope that costs can be driven down substantially while patient safety is protected. Pharmaceutical companies expect the data to aid in characterizing diseases and patient populations, targeting products and services and developing new products and therapies. According to a 2002 literature review on point of care barcode technology by Bridge Medical, at a hospital utilizing point of care, pharmaceutical packages embedded with computer chips were able to eliminate errors and improve efficiency substantially, protecting patient health while leading to annual savings.

While many of these technologies are still in a nascent stage, the potential for increased efficiency and patient safety is readily apparent. The ability for doctors to view a patient's detailed history, including blood tests, hospital stays and x-rays could prove invaluable, and even life-saving. Once the high initial costs are absorbed, the enhanced ability for patients to communicate with their doctors and medical professionals to communicate with each other could lead to an era of more efficient and accurate medical care than ever before.

Cheryl Jacque is a writer and researcher for The Health Administration Project, an online resource providing valuable and up-to-date information about the health administration field, including education and recent policy changes.

11 Ways to Engage Consumers in Patient Portals

September 5th, 2012 by Patricia Donovan
patient portal

Patient portals increase engagement, support stage 2 meaningful use.

Patient portals are an ideal way to boost patient engagement, a metric getting lots of attention in stage 2 of the federal government's incentive plan for meaningful use of EHRs. Stage 2, which will begin as early as 2014, increases health information exchange between providers and promotes patient engagement by giving patients secure online access to their health information.

Under the final rule issued last month, organizations vying for meaningful use incentives will not only have to demonstrate the availability of patient portals, but also the percentage of patients accessing health information via these channels.

There are plenty of portals already out there, but how can healthcare companies convince patients and health plan members to use the portal? Problems with portal awareness, functionality and health literacy can sink a portal project before it gets off the ground. In a Physicians Practice podcast, pediatrician Peter M. Kilbridge, a senior research director with The Advisory Board Company, suggests 11 ways to not only engage patients in portal use but also increase the likelihood they'll return to the tool continually to manage their health:

  1. Make sure patients are aware of the portal. Staff should inform patients about the portal, and brochures and sign-in credentials should be readily available, recommends Dr. Kilbridge.
  2. Highlight functions patients care about, such as the ability to send secure messages or questions and schedule referrals.
  3. If patients aren't scheduled to come in to the office for an appointment, send them an e-mail or snail mail announcement about the portal.
  4. When building a portal, it's important that patients get there on the first try. Keep the instructions and path to the portal simple.
  5. Define the physician's role in this process — the most important role, Dr. Kilbridge emphasizes. "Physicians have a greater ability than anyone else to influence. You must educate the physicians in proper portal use." Even among physicians, the digital divide is great, he adds. "Show the physicians how the portal will help them — by reducing phone calls, by motivating patients to follow up on test results." All of these benefits can improve overall clinical indicators for a practice.
  6. Encourage the healthy to use the portal. "Healthy patients will use the portal when it simplifies routine tasks, like making appointments."
  7. Add health and wellness information, such as links to community activities such as walks or runs, that providers can point to during visits.
  8. For patients with chronic illness, offer logs for them to enter regular data, such as weight o A1C levels, and activate red flags when they reach warning levels.
  9. Pay attention to health literacy levels, making sure the information and tools available from the portal are easy to understand.
  10. Coordinate the portal with other means of patient access, such as a call center or nurse advice line. These groups can also refer patients to the portal for more information.
  11. Coordinate the portal with other communication modalities. "Some portals can be built to interact with texting," notes Dr. Kilbridge, who estimates that about 85 percent of individuals are comfortable using texting.

What about the elderly? Will they use the portal? "There are always populations that won't use it — minorities, elders, the less educated."

But judging from the numbers of grandparents proudly sharing their grandchildren's photos on social networks like Facebook, expecting them to tackle a patient portal may not be such a stretch.

10 Ways Health IT Can Enhance Patient Care, Reduce Costs

July 16th, 2012 by Jackie Lyons

Caught between emerging advances in health information technology and the weight of the struggling economy, it is difficult to improve the provision of care and enhance the patient experience and outcome.

But what if there were a way to improve the quality of care without increasing costs? Verizon Connected Healthcare recently identified list 10 areas where it believes strategic use of technology will enhance patient care and reduce cost:

1. Telemedicine Removes the Geographic Barriers to Quality Care— Through telemedicine, hospitals can reduce preventable hospitalizations, which amount to $31 billion in annual costs. Telemedicine also brings the promise of providing remote care for the aging population, and patients with chronic conditions and difficulties in traveling. This technology can deliver new service to previously unserved markets, helping improve care for those markets, and bring in new revenue for providers.

2. Health Takes Flexibility to the Next Level in Caring for Patients— The rise in mobile health applications for smart phones has fostered more than 10,000 health applications in the iTunes store alone. According to Research2Guidance, the world market for mHealth apps will reach more than $1.2 billion in 2012. Healthcare providers now can leverage many applications to help patients better manage chronic disease, weight loss and other conditions, and medication reminders and heart rate monitors.

3. Chronic Disease is e-ManageableChronic disease accounts for 75 percent of every dollar spent on healthcare. At current growth rates, chronic disease spending, which is currently at $1.3 trillion, will more than double, to $2.2 trillion, by 2020. By leveraging health IT, providers can help patients better manage their conditions from anywhere at any time. For example, 95 percent of diabetes care is done by the patient at home, work or on the go, not by a clinic. Empowering the patient can be replicated in other areas of chronic care by harnessing telemedicine and mHealth applications to help provide patients with remote support and disease management.

4. Wellness and Preventative Care are Keystones of Health Education Encouraging health and well-being will help reduce the 70 percent of deaths in the United States stemming from preventable diseases. Many diseases can be prevented through education, and health IT is the new gateway to help modify unhealthy behaviors. For example, smart apps can help patients manage their health and well-being in real time, providing alerts to take medications, exercise or follow a recommended diet.

5. Fraud Solutions Shift from ‘Chasing’ to ‘Prevention’ — Healthcare fraud, waste and abuse are estimated to cost the United States $226 billion annually. Medicare fraud alone is estimated to cost the government $70 billion annually. Changing from a “pay-and-chase-model” to an “identify-and-intervene” approach is the first step in trying to stop fraud. Today’s technology-driven solutions, such as Verizon’s fraud management solution, monitor healthcare claims to identify fraudulent patterns before claims are paid — not after, when it is much more difficult to recoup dollars.

6. Data Breach Awareness Pays Off — According to the “Verizon 2012 Data Breach Investigations Report,” data breaches in the healthcare and social assistance industry groups represented more than 7 percent of the total breaches Verizon analyzed in 2011. The protection of patient information could help save billions yearly for the healthcare industry. Many healthcare breaches stem from simple mistakes such as lost or stolen laptops containing patient data. This can be prevented in several ways, including encrypting all devices carrying sensitive information and securing the network.

7. Cloud Computing Gives Patient Information a Shot in the Arm — Verizon believes the cloud will impact healthcare industry in many forms. Well-established cloud service providers can help healthcare businesses reduce operational costs and improve sharing of patient electronic health records. Cloud service providers are able to offer cloud-based services for the healthcare industry to help monitor, analyze and react to real-time patient information.

8. Electronic Health Records are the Building BlocksDigitized patient data can help reduce duplicate tests, administrative inefficiency and redundant paperwork, which equate to some $120 billion in annual spending. According to Verizon’s Tippett, “Because of regulations, the healthcare sector is 10 years behind the financial services industry when it comes to utilizing IT. To reduce costs and improve care, exchanging patient information digitally — from payors and providers to pharma and patients — must be embraced.”

9. Big Data Yields New Way to Look at Science— The widespread adoption of health IT will bring a new era of science in harnessing “big data” to improve quality of care. This will help doctors tap a new science of healthcare by aggregating and analyzing large amounts of patient data on treatments, conditions and more.

10. Data Pool Integration Makes for a Healthy System— Removing the silos of patient information will help enable better communications. Utilizing a common platform can unite the pharmaceutical, physician, patient, and provider for better information sharing. Creating a common data pool for these otherwise disenfranchised silos will transform the healthcare sector into a technology leader in storing, accessing and sharing critical information. This will ultimately help reduce redundant testing and paperwork, and reduce the chance of medical errors.

Q&A: Non-Compliance Drives Need for Telephonic Case Management

April 23rd, 2012 by Jessica Fornarotto

Though it emerges in different ways, non-compliance with care plans drives telephonic case management protocols for three distinct populations at Carolina Behavioral Health Alliance (CBHA), explains Jay Hale, its director of quality improvement and clinical operations.

Prior to his presentation on Telephonic Case Management: Protocols for Behavioral Healthcare Patients, Hale defines the distinct groups of behavioral health patients, indicators of non-compliance for each, barriers faced by telephonic case managers, the involvement of PCPs and red flags signaling the need of an in-person visit.

HIN: What is the number one reason behind high levels of inpatient or ER use by the behavioral health population?

(Jay Hale): When we look at the behavioral health population, we’re looking at three different groups of individuals, but with one reason driving all of their care. The three groups are adult mental health, adults with substance abuse issues and children/adolescents, which is generally mental health but can be substance abuse as well. The number one condition that we see is non-compliance with treatment. This comes out in various ways with our mental health population. It comes out as having suicidal thoughts or homicidal thoughts, or other impulsive or dangerous actions that would cause someone to be referred to the ER.

With our substance abuse population, we often see people who stop going to meetings, and/or who stop working with their sponsor and return to the behaviors that they were doing when they were drinking or using, which leads them back to drinking or using. Many of the relapse behaviors lead to using.

Our child/adolescent population is usually a little more complex. Because they don’t have the same control over their environment that adults do, many times they will act out more in either school or home, and that acting out escalates to a point where they’re referred to an ER.

Ultimately, it all comes back to failing to follow through with treatment for various reasons. Many times we begin to get some treatment early on and we get past the crisis, but it’s hard for people to accept that they have a chronic ongoing illness that needs ongoing treatment. Once they start to feel better, they stop or cut back on treatment, but then things begin to deteriorate for them and they don’t catch it until it’s at a crisis point where they’re back in the ER.

HIN: What barriers may a telephonic case manager encounter when contacting someone with a mental health issue? What advice do you give the case managers on establishing rapport during these calls?

(Jay Hale): One big barrier that we see is making sure that we have the member’s correct phone numbers. We want to make sure that we have updated information so that we’re calling the correct people. Another barrier is having the member on the other end trust us enough to accept our help, or accept our support, in their care.

I advise our case managers to work with other people who are working with the member early on. We want to work with the hospital earlier before the person is discharged to get correct contact information and to let the member know that we’re going to be contacting them. We want to be part of that discharge plan and operation, and we want our case management program to be part of that plan as well — a plan that shows that the patient is going to the psychiatrist, or a therapist, and that they’re going to be followed up by us telephonically.

When one of our case managers calls a member to invite them to be part of our program, we want to talk to the member about how the program helps them. We want to emphasize how this is helping them in their recovery for either a mental illness or for a substance abuse episode. With substance abuse individuals, we want to make sure that we are using the language that they are comfortable with in early recovery — language where we’re making sure we’re supporting their recovery program, they’re working their steps, they’re following through with their meetings, etc. We are letting them know that we understand their situation and that we’re supportive of them in their recovery. With mental health individuals, we want to make sure that they feel comfortable with us, that we are understanding their situation, and that we are not here to do counseling. Rather, we are here to support them in their recovery and to help them see the improvements that they’re seeing as they follow through with treatment.

With our child/adolescent population, we’re usually working with the parents. Many parents are appreciative of the support that we can give them as they try to help their child or adolescent do better in school, do better at home and have a more successful life early on. We’re about letting the parent know that we’re not here to blame anyone for any situation that the child is in, but rather, we’re there to support them in having a healthier family and a healthier child.

HIN: How involved is the individual’s primary care provider or any other providers in this process?

(Jay Hale): The member’s providers are a very important part of our program. We want to make sure that the member is going to their sessions, is seeing their psychiatrist or therapist, is going to meetings, etc. We reach out early to those behavioral health providers to let them know the member is involved in the program, that we are not there to be between their relationship — we’re an adjunct to support that ongoing relationship — and to let them know we solicit their support in this service so that the member understands that we’re all working toward one goal. And that one goal is improvement of the member’s care and helping them be and live successfully outside of a hospital environment. One of the things we’re looking at in care management, or case management, is making sure that they’re attending sessions. Behavioral health providers often like to hear that the insurance company is encouraging people to go to sessions rather than limiting sessions. We usually get a lot of support from our providers for what we’re doing.

HIN: You defined three very different groups. What are some indications or red flags that might arise during a call with a behavioral health client that could mean an in-person visit with a provider is warranted?

(Jay Hale): One of the things we’re looking for is changes in symptoms. Those changes in symptoms, or changes in habits, could be asking the individual at each call about their depression; any type of mania that they may be experiencing, if there’s a history of such. We’re asking about any other psychiatric symptoms that they’re having and asking the member to rate them. Then, we look at our information to see how much of a change that is from the last time we spoke.

If we start to hear about any kind of deterioration, we explore those issues further to see how serious it is — if it’s something that is temporary or something that is more ongoing. We’re also going to be looking for other factors, such as medication compliance. Is the person still following through with their medication? Did they have any difficulty with it? If they have, have they let their provider know they’re having difficulty with those medications? If we start to hear any kind of decompensation when we’re concerned about someone’s safety, or we’re concerned that someone is starting to slide back and return to the more unhealthy behaviors that they had in the beginning, we will make a phone call to that provider to see if we can get an appointment set up for that member to be seen quickly. This way, they can be assessed and changes in treatment can be arranged. Or it could be getting the member back into treatment again if they’ve fallen back or stopped going.

With our substance abuse individuals, often we’re looking for frequency of going to AA meetings, frequency of contact with their sponsor or any kind of irritability, especially over going to meetings. Many times individuals will start to talk about how the meetings are not helping them. We want to help them problem-solve around other things that could help them more and encourage them to start going back to those meetings or start working with that sponsor. If that’s not working, we may help them get in contact with an outpatient therapist who specializes in substance abuse issues to help see if there are other mental health concerns that are driving some of these relapse behaviors.

Can Reality Programming Help to Prevent Diabetes? Stay Tuned

March 15th, 2012 by Patricia Donovan

Think "The Real Patients with Diabetes:" a reality series follows six patients with Type 2 diabetes.

While it may not draw the legions of viewers of a "Real Housewives" franchise, UnitedHealth Group hopes this type of programming can impact a more dire reality: the number of individuals who will develop type 2 diabetes.

To pilot the power of television as a diabetes prevention medium, the Minnesota-based payor and Comcast are seeking viewers in the Knoxville, TN area to watch the 16-episode NOT ME ® video on demand (VOD) programming. NOT ME uses a reality TV format to follows six adults with prediabetes as they go through the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Each VOD episode will feature a health and wellness coach leading a class of real participants who are working to reach a healthier weight and reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Between each episode, participants in the UnitedHealth Group study will practice at home the skills they learn from the program.

Participants in the pilot also will be given tracking assignments each week and opportunities to put what they learn into action.

NOT ME is based on the CDC-led National Diabetes Prevention Program, which brings evidence-based lifestyle interventions to communities by working through organizations that adhere to CDC-recognized, evidence-based standards.

Meanwhile, new market research by the Healthcare Intelligence Network indicates that successful diabetes management necessitates a delicate balance of primary care, patient education, case management and medication monitoring.

The 80-some healthcare organizations that responded to the 2011 e-survey report that while the primary care physician is still the primary influencer in diabetes care, case managers and certified diabetes educators (CDEs) increasingly round out the care team.

Also supporting the plan of care are health coaches (live and via telephone) and support groups.

Respondents' efforts appear to be working: one-fifth of respondents report program ROI of between 2:1 and 3:1.

Since the goal of any diabetes management program is to guide the patient toward successful self-management of the disease, education is paramount. Many respondents reported the presence of case managers and/or nurses who have trained as CDEs. One respondent even offers patients a choice between a pharmacist, a registered dietician or a CDE.

Printed materials were overwhelmingly the most common educational component, reported by 78 percent of respondents. Thirty-five percent offer Web-based education tools.

With all of the challenges facing patients with diabetes, should patients be incentivized for successful self-management of their disease? Three-quarters of survey respondents say yes.

In fact, almost a third of respondents — 30.4 percent — already offer patients and health plan members incentives for compliance with their plans of care.