Archive for the ‘Quality Improvement’ Category

Infographic: Impact of Diagnostics on Healthcare Outcomes

April 20th, 2018 by Melanie Matthews

Diagnostic testing plays a key role in reducing hospitalizations, preventing infections, and improving healthcare outcomes, according to a new infographic by Health Industry Distributors Association.

The infographic explores the impact of diagnostic testing on healthcare utilization, infections, adverse health events, patient satisfaction and healthcare costs.

Healthcare Trends & Forecasts in 2018: Performance Expectations for the Healthcare IndustryHealthcare Trends & Forecasts in 2018: Performance Expectations for the Healthcare Industry, HIN’s 14th annual business forecast, is designed to support healthcare C-suite planning as leaders react to presidential priorities and seek new strategies for engaging providers, patients and health plan members in value-based care.

HIN’s highly anticipated annual strategic playbook opens with perspectives from industry thought leader Brian Sanderson, managing principal, healthcare services, Crowe Horwath, who outlines a roadmap to healthcare provider success by examining the key issues, challenges and opportunities facing providers in the year to come. Following Sanderson’s outlook is guidance for healthcare payors from David Buchanan, president, Buchanan Strategies, on navigating seven hot button areas for insurers, from the future of Obamacare to the changing face of telehealth to the surprising role grocery stores might one day play in healthcare delivery. Click here for more information.

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

Have an infographic you’d like featured on our site? Click here for submission guidelines.

Mounting Pressure from Value-Based Reimbursement Models Drives Clinical Improvement Strategy at Allina Health System

April 17th, 2018 by Melanie Matthews

Value-Based Reimbursement Models Drive Clinical Improvement Strategy

As a greater percentage of hospital payments are through value-based contracts, hospitals that reduce costs while maintaining quality will survive, predicts Pam Rush, cardiovascular clinical service line program director at Allina Health.

“How do we improve outcomes and decrease costs?” Rush asked participants in the March 2018 webinar, Predictive Healthcare Analytics: Four Pillars for Success. “We need to start to look at the world differently.”

How can we be more creative and do things differently? How can we use different members of the healthcare teams in new ways, such as nurse practitioners or advanced practice providers, she added. In addition, “we need to invest in data analytics and data resources and have data analysts who can pull the information for us so we can find the variation. We need to invest in physician and caregiver time to look at the data, to make changes in how they improve care, to monitor and see what is working and what doesn’t work.”

These four pillars…population health management, reducing clinical variation, testing new care processes and new models of payment, and leveraging cutting edge technologies…have been critical to the work at Allina Health System’s Minneapolis Heart Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation, said Rush.

In population health management, we’re looking at how can we focus on adherence to guidelines, identify where there are gaps in care and partner with people across the system, primary care and specialists, to improve consistency and adherence to guidelines, she explained.

Allina is reducing clinical variation by looking at unnecessary variations in care where there is inconsistent care without an influence on outcomes.

“We’re also looking at new ways of doing things. How can we use our nurse practitioners, how do we care for patients once they’re discharged from the hospital and bring them back in for clinic visits? It’s really looking at the care model and how we can do things differently to reduce total cost of care,” she said.

In cardiology, there are so many new devices, procedures and techniques to monitor, said Rush, but we need to figure out who are the right providers to do that monitoring, who are the right patients to do these expensive procedures on and who achieves the best outcomes, because we can’t afford to do all of this new technology to every single person.

Allina looks at these four pillars across the continuum. Starting in primary care to partner on prevention strategies, moving to who gets referred to cardiology, and when they’re referred to cardiology, what are the set of tests or treatments and guidelines to adhere to along the continuum to subspecialties, emergency services and all the way up through advanced therapies, such as transplant.

During the webinar, Rush along with Dr. Steven Bradley, cardiologist, MHI and associate director, MHI Healthcare Delivery Innovation Center, shared these four pillars of predictive analytics success along with details on creating a culture of quality and innovation, building performance improvement dashboards, as well as several case examples of quality improvement initiatives contributing to these savings and much more.

Listen to Ms. Rush describe how MHI leveraged an enterprise data warehouse to identify care gaps and clinical quality improvement opportunities.

Guest Post: Outcomes Drive the Evidence-Based Practice Journey

March 29th, 2018 by Michele Farrington and Cindy Dawson

The Institute of Medicine set a goal that 90 percent of all healthcare decisions will be evidence-based by 2020. Executives and nursing leaders, at all levels within organizations, have clear responsibility for making this goal a reality and ensuring consistent, standardized use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in care delivery that will meet patient, family, clinician, and organizational outcomes.

Promoting use of evidence, valuing questioning of clinical and administrative practice, and building organizational capacity, culture, and commitment are pivotal to building a supportive organizational culture related to EBP.

Organizations must meet regulatory requirements, from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and The Joint Commission, that incorporate EBPs and the need for increasing public accountability and transparency (e.g., use of national benchmarks) for quality and safety. Financial incentives associated with pay-for-performance are also directly linked to EBP. Despite these outside forces in today’s healthcare environment, clinicians and executives cannot forget about the need to provide individualized patient care, which includes patient engagement strategies aimed at improving the overall patient experience.

EBP is a continuous journey for individual clinicians and organizations alike and starts with building organizational capacity.

Organizational Capacity

EBP capacity is built using a strategic, systematic approach to create a solid foundation and infrastructure to support the work. Before EBP work can be successful at the unit or clinic level, EBP must be integrated at the organizational level and a culture for change must exist.

The organization’s mission, vision, and strategic plan must include EBP language to ensure evidence-based healthcare is clearly portrayed as the organizational norm. Creating a culture valuing inquiry and innovation must start during orientation for new hires and continue during competency review for current employees and through ongoing training and professional development opportunities for both clinicians and executive leaders.

An infrastructure that directly integrates EBP work into the organizational governance structure is needed to support the mission, vision, and strategic plan. A crucial organizational decision is determining what group will hold primary accountability or functional responsibility for EBP to ensure it is integrated into practice processes, policies, and documentation.

Recruiting and hiring clinicians and executives with experience and/or interest in EBP will help build the desired culture and capacity. EBP mentors are developed from successful projects and are used to nurture the next generation.

A well-defined path for EBP includes adoption of an EBP-process model to guide implementation and sustained organizational change across disciplines. There are a number of EBP process models: The Iowa Model Revised: Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Excellence in Health Care; Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model; Stetler Model of Evidence-Based Practice; and Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration (ARCC) Model. Each model follows a step-by-step problem-solving process suitable for concurrent use with the organization’s quality improvement processes.

Culture

The governance structure must clearly outline the process and channels for communicating EBP work and obtaining necessary approvals from applicable committees. EBP discussions should be a regular agenda item for all shared governance committees.

Project results should be reported internally through the organization’s shared governance and quality improvement structures to promote practice change adoption, share learning, garner continued support (e.g., time, resources), and as a platform to recognize success for the institution’s EBP program.

Successful EBP work takes time and effort, so successes should be celebrated and rewarded throughout the process. Celebrations are an opportunity to spotlight clinicians for doing this work and helps build a pervasive culture that supports and expects use of evidence in practice. These strategies promote organizational buy-in and commitment for the EBP process and set higher standards as a foundation for future efforts.

Expected behaviors from clinicians across all job classifications at every level must clearly demonstrate the value of EBP. Behavioral expectations regarding EBP are easily set if they are built into every job description and can be quickly reviewed annually during the performance appraisal process. Utilizing documents and mechanisms that already occur is an easy and efficient way to promote positive reinforcement and priority setting in busy work environments with many ongoing and competing demands for clinicians’ and leaders’ time and attention.

Benefits

EBP is value-added with a strong return on investment and responds to current priorities. A single project may improve patient and clinician safety, improve clinical outcomes, improve patient/family satisfaction, promote innovate care, and/or reduce costs.

Clinicians, nurses, and leaders all influence an organization’s capacity for EBP. Leaders who demonstrate and expect EBP will promote its use in clinical and operational decision-making at the unit or clinic and organizational levels. Building on the organization’s mission, vision, capacity, and value for delivery of reliable, safe, high quality care provides a foundation for success.

About the Authors:

Michele Farrington, BSN, RN, CPHON, is a clinical healthcare research associate at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. She is certified in pediatric hematology/oncology nursing and received her BSN from the University of Iowa. She has been leading, co-leading, or mentoring EBP initiatives since 2003, and her work has been awarded extramural funding, validating the strength of the projects and impact on nursing care. She is widely published and has given multiple local, regional, national, and international presentations.

Cindy Dawson, MSN, RN, CORLN, is the chief nurse executive and associate director of the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. She received her BSN from the University of Iowa, MSN from the University of Phoenix, and is a Certified Otorhinolaryngology Nurse. Over the course of her career, she has published extensively on EBP, nurse triage, nursing management/leadership, and clinical practice guidelines and has given numerous local, regional, national, and international presentations on these topics.

HIN Disclaimer: The opinions, representations and statements made within this guest article are those of the author and not of the Healthcare Intelligence Network as a whole. Any copyright remains with the author and any liability with regard to infringement of intellectual property rights remains with them. The company accepts no liability for any errors, omissions or representations.

Infographic: 5 Factors Driving Healthcare Digital Transformation

November 8th, 2017 by Melanie Matthews

Increases in life expectancy, changing consumer behavior, political uncertainties, inflation and rising number of chronic diseases are helping to drive the digital health transformation demand, according to a new infographic by InsightRush.

The infographic examines how each of these factors is contributing to the digital health transformation.

2016 Healthcare Benchmarks: Digital HealthDigital health, also referred to as ‘connected health,’ leverages technology to help identify, track and manage health problems and challenges faced by patients. Person-centric health management is slowly acknowledging the device-driven lives of patients and health plan members and incorporating these tools into care delivery and management efforts.

2016 Healthcare Benchmarks: Digital Health examines program goals, platforms, components, development strategies, target populations and health conditions, patient engagement metrics, results and challenges reported by more than 100 healthcare organizations responding to the February 2016 Digital Health survey by the Healthcare Intelligence Network.

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

Have an infographic you’d like featured on our site? Click here for submission guidelines.

4 Ways CMS 2018 Quality Payment Program Supports ‘Patients Over Paperwork’ Pledge

November 6th, 2017 by Patricia Donovan

“Patients Over Paperwork” is committed to removing regulatory obstacles that get in the way of providers spending time with patients.

Year 2 of the CMS Quality Payment Program promises continued flexibility and reduced provider burden, according to the program’s final rule with comment issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) last week.

The Quality Payment Program (QPP), established by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), is a quality payment incentive program for physicians and other eligible clinicians that rewards value and outcomes in one of two ways: through the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs).

A QPP Year 2 fact sheet issued by CMS highlights 2018 changes for providers under the QPP’s MIPS and APM tracks. The Year 2 fact sheet noted that stakeholder feedback helped to shape policies for QPP Year 2, and that  “CMS is continuing many of its transition year policies while introducing modest changes.”

In keeping with the federal payor’s recently launched “Patients Over Paperwork” initiative, QPP Year 2 reflects the following changes:

    • More options for small practices (groups of 15 or fewer clinicians). Options include exclusions for individual MIPS-eligible clinicians or groups with less than or equal to $90,000 in Part B allowed charges or less than or equal to 200 Part B beneficiaries, opportunities to earn additional points, and the choice to form or join a virtual group.
    • Addresses extreme and uncontrollable circumstances, such as hurricanes and other natural disasters, for both the 2017 transition year and the 2018 MIPS performance period, by offering hardship exception applications and limited exemptions.
    • Includes virtual groups as another participation option for Year 2. A virtual group is a combination of two more taxpayer identification numbers (TINs) made up of solo practitioners and groups of 10 or fewer eligible clinicians who come together ‘virtually’ (no matter specialty or location) to participate in MIPS for a performance period of a year. A CMS Virtual Groups Toolkit provides more information, including the election process to become a virtual group.
    • Makes it easier for clinicians to qualify for incentive payments by participating in Advanced APMs that begin or end in the middle of a year. Updated QPP policies for 2018 further encourage and reward participation in APMs in Medicare.
  • CMS describes its Patients Over Paperwork effort as “a cross-cutting, collaborative process that evaluates and streamlines regulations with a goal to reduce unnecessary burden, increase efficiencies and improve the beneficiary experience. This effort emphasizes a commitment to removing regulatory obstacles that get in the way of providers spending time with patients.”

    Data Analytics, SDOH Screenings Flag Disengaged and 12 More Patient Engagement Trends

    October 5th, 2017 by Patricia Donovan

    More than 70 percent of healthcare organizations have created formal patient engagement initiatives, according to 2017 benchmarks from the Healthcare Intelligence Network.


    To identify individuals that are poorly engaged in their health, nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of healthcare organizations mine clinical data analytics, according to the 2017 Patient Engagement Survey by the Healthcare Intelligence Network, while 37 percent screen patients for social determinants of health related to housing, care access, transportation, nutrition and finances.

    Patients who screen positive for social determinants of health (SDOH) and individuals with diabetes are typically the most difficult populations to engage, according to 2017 survey benchmarks.

    Thirty-five percent of respondents to the September 2017 survey said the presence of SDOHs, which the World Health Organization defines as “conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age,” pose the greatest challenge to health engagement, while 26 percent said a diabetes diagnosis presents the top clinical challenge to engagement interventions.

    One-quarter report some resolution of SDOH factors resulting from engagement efforts.

    To improve engagement, 75 percent of respondents rely on education of patients, family and caregivers, supported with telephonic outreach (13 percent) and home visits (13 percent).

    Efforts by 71 percent of respondents to create a formal patient engagement program underscore the critical role of engagement in healthcare’s value-based care and reimbursement models, particularly in regards to chronic illness.

    In other survey findings:

    • Patient experience rankings are the most reliable measure of engagement program success, say 43 percent.
    • For one quarter of respondents, patient engagement is the primary domain of case managers.
    • Eighty-three percent saw quality metrics improve as a result of patient engagement efforts.
    • Half attributed a drop in hospital emergency room visits to their patient engagement interventions.

    Download an executive summary of the 2017 Patient Engagement Survey.

    Infographic: Industry Perspectives on Value-Based Payment

    October 4th, 2017 by Melanie Matthews

    The shift to value-based payment is a slow one, with most health plans not yet making the transition to risk, according to a new infographic by HealthScape Advisors.

    The infographic examines the percentage of plans in upside and downside risk contracts, the impact of health plan sponsor on risk contracts, cost and quality impacts for risk contracts, value-based payment enablers and recommendations for success in value-based contracts.

    The accountable care organization, or ACO, has become a cornerstone of healthcare delivery system and payment reform by raising the bar on healthcare quality and reducing unnecessary costs. There are now more than 700 ACOs in existence today, by a 2017 SK&A estimate.

    2017 Healthcare Benchmarks: Accountable Care Organizations, HIN’s fifth compendium of metrics on ACOs, captures ACO operation in today’s value- and quality-focused healthcare environment.

    Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

    Have an infographic you’d like featured on our site? Click here for submission guidelines.

    Infographic: Food Insecurity Among Medicaid Seniors

    October 2nd, 2017 by Melanie Matthews

    There’s an estimated 5.2 million seniors who are eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) but are not enrolled, according to a new infographic by Benefits Data Trust.

    The infographic examines the impact of food insecurity on seniors’ health and healthcare costs and quality.

    2017 Healthcare Benchmarks: Social Determinants of HealthInitiatives such as CMS’ Accountable Health Communities Model and other population health platforms encourage healthcare organizations to tackle the broad range of social, economic and environmental factors that shape an individual’s health. To underscore the need to address social determinants of health, Healthy People 2020 included “Create social and physical environments that promote good health for all” among its four overarching goals for the decade.

    In one measure of their impact, 2015 research by Brigham Young University found that the social determinants of loneliness and social isolation are just as much a threat to longevity as obesity.

    2017 Healthcare Benchmarks: Social Determinants of Health documents the efforts of more than 140 healthcare organizations to assess social, economic and environmental factors in patients and to begin to redesign care management to account for these factors.

    Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

    Have an infographic you’d like featured on our site? Click here for submission guidelines.

    Infographic: Patients Want a Better Healthcare Experience

    September 1st, 2017 by Melanie Matthews

    Patients are demanding more from their healthcare experience, according to a new infographic by MM&M. Technology can help solve these demands, but providers will likely have to make changes to the way they practice medicine to improve patient satisfaction.

    The infographic lists the top five things patients say improves their satisfaction with healthcare providers and provides insight into the healthcare consumer mindset.

    UnityPoint Health has moved from a siloed approach to improving the patient experience at each of its locations to a system-wide approach that encompasses a consistent, baseline experience while still allowing for each institution to address its specific needs.

    Armed with data from its Press Ganey and CAHPS® Hospital Survey scores, UnityPoint’s patient experience team developed a front-line staff-driven improvement action plan.

    Improving the Patient Experience: Engaging Front-line Staff for a System-Wide Action Plan, a 45-minute webinar on July 27th, now available for replay, Paige Moore, director, patient experience at UnityPoint Health—Des Moines, shares how the organization switched from a top-down, leadership-driven patient experience improvement approach to one that engages front-line staff to own the process.

    Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

    Have an infographic you’d like featured on our site? Click here for submission guidelines.

    Food for Thought: Nutrition Programs Reduce Hospital Visits and Readmissions by Vulnerable Populations

    August 18th, 2017 by Patricia Donovan

    Malnutrition is a social determinant of health that negatively impacts health outcomes.

    It’s a difficult statistic to digest: one in three people enter the hospital malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, a state that impacts their recovery and increases their risk of health complications and rehospitalizations.

    Two studies this week highlight the clinical benefits of addressing patients’ nutrition needs before and during hospital stays as well as savings that can result from identification of social determinants of health (SDOH) like access to nutrition that drive 85 percent of health outcomes.

    In the first, a study of elderly Maryland residents by Benefits Data Trust, a national nonprofit based in Philadelphia, found that when it comes to low-income seniors, access to quality food via food stamps can also save money by reducing the number and duration of hospital visits and nursing home admissions.

    In the second, research published in American Health & Drug Benefits journal and supported by Abbott found that when Advocate Health Care implemented a nutrition care program at four of its Chicago area hospitals, it showed more than $4.8 million in cost savings due to shorter hospital stays and lower readmission rates.

    The Benefits Data Trust research found that participation by low-income seniors in the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) cut their odds of hospital admissions by 14 percent. The food stamps also reduced the need for ER visits by 10 percent, and cut their likelihood of going into a nursing home by nearly one quarter.

    Finally, SNAP participation also led to an 8 to 10 percent drop in the number of days a patient who was admitted remained in one of these facilities.

    As a result, hospitals and health care systems such as Advocate Health Care are looking at the value of nutrition to improve care and help patients get back to living a healthier life.

    Starting in 2014, Advocate Health Care, the largest health system in Illinois and one of the largest accountable care organizations (ACO) in the country, implemented two models of a nutrition care program for patients at risk of malnutrition. The nutrition-focused quality improvement program, which targeted malnourished hospitalized patients, consisted of screening patients with a validated screening tool at admission, rapidly administering oral nutritional supplements, and educating patients on supplement adherence.

    The leader in population health found that by doing so, it reduced 30-day readmission rates by 27 percent and the average hospital stay by nearly two days.

    More recently, to evaluate the cost-savings of the Advocate approach, researchers used a novel, web-based budget impact model to assess the potential cost savings from the avoided readmissions and reduced time in hospital. Compared to the hospitals’ previous readmission rates and patients’ average length of stay, researchers found that optimizing nutrition care in the four hospitals resulted in roughly $3,800 cost savings per patient treated for malnutrition.

    Given the healthcare industry’s appetite for value- and quality-based programs, SDOH screenings and the fortification of nutrition programs in both community and inpatient settings appear to be just what the doctor ordered. However, while a 2017 study on Social Determinants of Health identified widespread adoption of SDOH screenings by providers, it also documented a scarcity of supportive community services for SDOH-positive individuals.