Archive for the ‘Healthcare Quality Ratings’ Category

High-Risk Patient Roster Helps Atrius Pioneer ACO ‘Beat the Benchmark’

May 17th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Webinar Replay: Lessons from Atrius Health Pioneer ACO

They don't call them pioneers for nothing.

A high-risk patient roster, a retooled geriatric care model and a preferred SNF network are just a few Atrius Health innovations on the healthcare frontier.

Atrius Health is one of 32 participants in the CMS Pioneer ACO program testing alternative payment and program design models for accountable care organizations. Emily Brower, Atrius Health executive director of accountable care programs, shared first-year lessons during a recent webinar, Medicare Pioneer ACO: Case Study on Atrius Health's Focus on the Triple Aim.

Atrius was drawn to the three-year Pioneer ACO program for a number of reasons. First, it offered the non-profit alliance of six independent medical groups a chance to showcase its core competencies, including its rich data environment, foundation in the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model and new home care services, Ms. Brower said.

Also, it gave the Massachusetts organization a chance to build a population-based approach to managing its Medicare population as a whole, with Triple Aim goals as a foundation.

And finally, they had a lot of faith in the staff of the CMS Center for Medicare/Medicaid Innovation, where the project resides. "We feel they really understand the issues we face in being accountable for care across the continuum," noted Ms. Brower.

The Pioneer ACO shared savings and loss model challenges participants to perform against nationally identified trends. CMS take a participating ACO's population and creates from the national Medicare database a reference population, she explained. "We’re trying to beat the trend in that national population, or 'beat the benchmark.'"

In 2012, Atrius launched six clinical and technical initiatives to address the program's 33 quality measures — "the gate through which the ACO achieves savings." Key among them is its eight-step high-risk patient roster review, a hallmark of Atrius's redesigned geriatric care model.

"We used a new risk stratification tool to identify our high-risk patients, who go on a roster reviewed by a multidisciplinary team in the primary care practice to identify care gaps, including a need for advance directives." One outcome of the roster's use has been an increase in end-of-life conversations, she says.

On the technical support side, Atrius Health developed new tools within its EPIC® electronic health record (EHR) for tracking quality efforts, advanced care planning, medication reconciliation and other key metrics.

Ms. Brower estimates the total investment to launch the ACO, including the EHR, quality measurement tools and other efforts, to be between $2 and $3 million; the medical groups themselves likely spent that much again for additional care management resources.

"In terms of payback, we expect that we will be able to reduce the cost of care — to bend the cost curve so that we are beating the benchmark and creating savings that then support our additional investments."

Among programs on the drawing board: new ways to use the geriatric well visit, a home-based primary care program for high-risk patients, two programs for dual eligibles, and a patient advisory group.

Atrius Health is committed to the Pioneer ACO program, despite concerns from some participants over the program's quality measurement process communicated to CMS last month. "We know it’s going to take time. As we would say, ‘We’re not called pioneers for nothing.’ It took us that first year to identify develop most of the tools and infrastructure that CMS needed."

She continues: "The new measures that I mentioned that are coming out of the EHR being reported directly to CMS — that piece that we had to put together. There just wasn’t an existing pool of data to build benchmarks for those measures. Now that we have data, CMS will use this to create empirical benchmarks, which was one of the recommendations in that Pioneers communication."

Listen to an audio interview with Atrius Health's Emily Brower.

Infographic: Mapping Healthcare Performance Variation Across Regions

May 2nd, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

WhyNotTheBest.org, The Commonwealth Fund's benchmarking site, includes an interactive map enabling users to compare regions, counties, and states on measures of healthcare quality and safety, outcomes, and patient experiences. This infographic shows the best and worst regions on three different measures of healthcare performance: readmissions for heart failure, patient satisfaction and the patient experience, and surgical care improvement.

Mapping Healthcare Performance Variation Across Regions

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

You may also be interested in this related resource: A Strategic, Best Practice Approach to Improve CMS Star Quality Ratings.

Advice from 5-Star Medicare Advantage Plans: Engage Low-Performing Providers, Members

April 25th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Webinar Replay: Best Practice Approach to Improve CMS Star Quality Ratings

Medicare Advantage health plans in search of higher Star Quality Ratings should follow the lead of five-star MA plans, suggests Joe Johnson, vice president of L.E.K. Consulting.

Five-star best practices for improving all-important clinical performance markers include mailings and telephonic outreach to low-performing member cohorts, notes Johnson, as well as shared savings, profit-sharing goals and even provider report cards. The latter is likely to spur low-performing providers into aligning with health plan quality improvement efforts, which can help to raise ratings.

Provider engagement is critical, since the majority of the Star Quality Ratings' 37 measures, which span five domains, is influenced by the work done by providers, such as in closing gaps in care and managing chronic conditions, and are weighted most heavily by CMS. For example, the monitoring of care transitions to prevent readmissions is one area where five-star plans shine, he says.

During a recent webinar on A Strategic, Best Practice Approach to Improve CMS Star Quality Ratings, Johnson suggested MA plans map out an enterprise-wide Star Quality Ratings strategy to target improvement opportunities and identify the most addressable gaps in the organization — giving priority to those that will give the plan the most 'bang' for its buck.

Reimbursement for MA plans is tied in part to awarding of stars for patient care and satisfaction. Factoring in the bonus structure for high-performing plans, L.E.K Consulting estimates that moving from a three-star to four-star rating is roughly worth $50 PMPM — or $6 million in revenue per year for a 10,000-member plan.

Of the five domains in the Star Quality Ratings Program, management of chronic conditions is ripest for MA plan innovation and improvement, Johnson notes. Plans should identify the size and magnitude of conditions presenting in their member populations, and prioritize efforts based on potential for economic impact.

The designated "Star Czars" team (individuals spearheading the quality ratings improvement effort) should be cross-functional and analytical but also speak the requisite clinical language to inform and engage providers, advises Johnson.

Johnson also shared a half-dozen other strategies for Star Quality Ratings improvement from five-star plans, including benchmarking of local competitors, and examined some of the changes CMS is considering for 2014 and 2015 Star Quality Ratings.

Listen to an in-depth interview with Joe Johnson here.

The PHO in 2013: More Flexibility, Less Risk Than Eighties Model

January 31st, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Unlike the hospital-dominated physician-hospital organization (PHO) prominent 30 years ago, today's PHOs are largely physician-centric, notes Travis Ansel, manager of strategic services for the Healthcare Strategy Group. And make no mistake: in the new fee-for-value healthcare universe, payors and employers understand that physicians are the one that control process and control cost, he asserts.

"Hospitals and physicians have a great incentive right now to figure out how they should be working together going forward, and how they need to align legally and what model to use in order to engage those populations," Ansel notes. Providers unable to provide efficient quality care that’s going to help hospitals survive under value-driven reimbursement will face losses in market share and reimbursement, he continues.

Ansel and Greg Mertz, director of Healthcare Strategy Group, recently explored the key contractual elements to consider when creating a PHO during a webinar on Physician Hospital Organizations: Developing a Collaborative Structure for Shared Savings Agreements.

Today's PHOs are jointly governed by physicians and hospitals, they explain, with the common goals of quality and cost management and the sharing of savings from any joint contracts or arrangements — elements that weren't necessarily part of the eighties' PHO equation.

Compared to other emerging shared savings arrangements — the Medicare Shared Savings Program, commercial accountable care organizations (ACOs) and public and private bundled payments — PHOs offer more flexibility, notes Mertz. For example, a PHO has the option of expanding into an ACO in the future, as well as target multiple populations, something that can be more challenging in an ACO due to its reporting requirements. "Today's PHO is scalable. It can start with a single client and grow to ACO."

But flexibility doesn't preclude serious considerations around forming a PHO, he continues, including its legal structure, number and type of participating physicians, size of the patient population, compensation plans, data support, and most importantly, evidence-based protocols against which to measure PHO performance. And while cost reduction is paramount, patient satisfaction levels are getting equal attention.

"The big difference between today's programs and the gatekeeper HMO’s back in the eighties is that nobody worried about whether the patient was happy with the HMO," says Mertz. "Now within public programs, there’s a formal process of monitoring and reporting on patient satisfaction."

What will the typical PHO look like? Owner physicians and hospitals, plus contracted providers such as imaging, pharmacy and other ancillary services. The PHO team will also rely heavily on nurse case managers, nurse navigators to really interact with the patients as they help to coordinate their care. "It's cheaper to intervene now than in the emergency room," Mertz notes.

It is also important to have an accurate picture of the patient population. "Diabetes, pulmonary, cardiac, and depression are the top cost drivers, but dual eligibles (Medicare-Medicaid patients) and patients with behavioral issues are chronically non-compliant and are the biggest cost consumers. It’s important to identify those people up front and develop a patient registry-managed plan for those patients."

Of course, key to any shared savings model is quantifying the cost of services and then savings gleaned from the PHO's clinical protocols and quality efforts — then distributing the savings equitably.

The challenge for fledgling PHOs will be changing provider behaviors. "Participants have to believe that the PHO is better than the alternative," says Mertz. "Creating a culture of collaboration is key; success hinges on provider engagement."

And not just the physicians that are part of the PHO. "The PHO is really a vehicle to involve all physicians, including community doctors," concludes Ansel. "Community physicians that aren’t a part of employed networks are just as important and have just as much insight as to how the industry succeeds under this new reality."

Listen to an expanded interview with Travis Ansel and Greg Mertz about today's physician-hospital organizations.

Q&A: Predicting 2013 Healthcare Trends

January 29th, 2013 by Jessica Fornarotto

“There will be a significant investment in EHRs in 2013,” predicts Dennis Eder, managing director of Strategic Health Group. Eder also expects there will be more physician-run ACOs in 2013 compared to 2012.

Prior to their presentations during an October webinar on Healthcare Trends & Forecasts in 2013: A Strategic Planning Session, Eder, along with Hank Osowski, managing director of Strategic Health Group, and Steven Valentine, president of The Camden Group, shared the changes they see coming in 2013 for the healthcare industry, including future payment models, ACO administration, and demands for services.

HIN: Physician payment models are getting a lot of retooling — from the addition of pay for performance incentives for hitting quality metrics to care coordination payments for patients and members in medical homes. Is this going to change much in 2013? Are we going to see a shift toward shared savings or another payment model in the coming year?

(Hank Osowksi): Watching the trends over the last year or two and many of the innovations that are being tried, the industry is moving toward value-based purchasing and population risk-based purchasing. We think this is going to accelerate as we look at 2013, 2014 and beyond.

(Dennis Eder): I would agree with Hank. We believe with the events of 2012 and the significant interest in ACO participation, it will mature and continue into the future.

HIN: In comparing some results from our 2011 and 2012 surveys on accountable care organizations, we noticed a sizeable shift in ACO administration from hospital-run to physician-administered. Why do you think so many hospitals backed away from this role when the ACO model seemed so promising?

(Dennis Eder): One of the reasons we think this may be occurring is that hospitals administering ACOs is not part of their core competency. Many of the characteristics of an ACO are a health plan or a management service organization (MSO). And this is not what hospitals do, for the most part. In addition, hospital margins are thin, and have even become thinner, so any overhead that they can offload is a good thing. Physician organizations do this and they’re the ones who are responsible for the medical management and other care management in an ACO. I think it makes logical sense to have the physician organization take on more of an administrative role for an ACO.

(Hank Osowski): I think the point Dennis made is critically important. It is the physician organization that is controlling the array of services that the beneficiary is receiving. It makes sense for them to take a lead in running an ACO. They are the ones who best understand how all the pieces fit together and where the opportunities are to get efficiencies to improve quality and reduce the costs of care.

HIN: The IOM has recommended better and shared use of health data, particularly at the point of care, where key health decisions are made. What will be the technology to invest in or embrace in 2013 to improve data analytics for population health management?

(Dennis Eder): We’re going to continue to see a significant investment in EHRs. We know that it’s an important tool in some health plans. Kaiser, for example, is gaining significant market share. We see further investments in that particular area.

(Hank Osowski): It’s also important to take a self-examination of us as an industry. We have mountains of data. We have very little intelligence about where the value is in our system. Where can we leverage the most efficient of the care providers and change some of the things that are inefficient, that don’t contribute to high quality care and that drive up the costs? It’s digging into that mountain of data and pulling out the real healthcare intelligence that we as a system, and as an industry, can use to provide better care to patients.

HIN: What's ahead for population health management?

(Steven Valentine): We will begin to see more fierce competition, if you will, around population health management. People are going to try to concur and grab more populations to work with in their delivery systems. We’re expecting that we should have slightly soft demands for services. We would find that even with the population getting older, and with these new delivery systems and lower utilization rates, we don’t expect to see an uptick in volume — stable to a slight decline — which means you have to reduce your expenses and go after an additional market share population.

Infographic: Does Better Education Equal Better Health?

January 11th, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

Is education a predictor of an individual's health quality and longevity? This infographic, part of the New Public Health National Prevention Strategy series from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, tells a visual story on the role of education in the health of American communities.

According to this research, an additional four years of education reduces a range of health risks.

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

Infographic: Why are ACOs Necessary?

January 1st, 2013 by Patricia Donovan

The first original infographic from Healthcare IT Connect examines the need for accountable care organizations (ACOs), reporting on the facts surrounding the formation of ACOs in the United States, including developments with the 32 Pioneer ACOs and efforts to promote higher quality care at lower costs. While the United States spends the most per capita in the world for healthcare, it does not necessarily enjoy the longest lifespans or highest quality overall health.

Why Are ACOs Necessary

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics, a bi-weekly, e-newsletter digest of visual healthcare data. Click here to sign up today.

Reporting, Registry, Risk Calculations Help to Bend Bon Secours Cost Curve

October 9th, 2012 by Patricia Donovan

Novel HR models like the embedding of nurse navigators, aggressive use of health IT and adoption of emerging care delivery models like the patient-centered medical home are the three pillars supporting population health management for Bon Secours Health System, and in particular, within Bon Secours Virginia Medical Group (BSVMG), explained chief clinical officer Robert Fortini during a webinar on Improving Population Health Management Through Effective, Efficient Data Analytics.

This reengineered approach comes with tools and technology for both the patient and the provider, he explained.

In just 18 months, more than 60,000 patients have enrolled in MyChart®, Bon Secours' patient portal. Additionally, providers and support staff — in particular nurse navigators embedded in Bon Secours primary care practices — are aggressively using a subset of tools built into its EPIC® electronic health record to identify high-risk patients and more tightly manage transitions of care for these individuals.

The more than 30 Virginia-based nurse navigators get "marching orders" from the daily hospital discharge registry generated by the EHR, Fortini explained. "This is where they begin and end their day," he said, reaching out telephonically to these patients within 24 to 48 hours of discharge, when they can have the most impact.

The conversations? Chiefly medication reconciliation, follow-up appointments, red flags to watch for. The calling schedule? Three different times during the first week following discharge. If they can't reach a patient, they send a letter, either in the mail or via MyChart if the patient is using the portal.

Other useful EHR-based functionalities include the ability to identify the "stage" of heart failure for CHF patients, as well as a risk calculator that generates a patient's risk index based on a host of factors: length of hospital stay, comorbidities, number of ER visits, etc. Patients with a risk index of 11 or greater are considered high-risk and subject to more intensive interventions. Bon Secours also has taken risk management a step further with its development of a "high-risk registry" to identify what Fortini calls "hot-spotters" in need of intensive care management.

"We're using it very effectively," he says. "We want to know who our highest risk patients are, and we want to do the most intense management with them."

The EHR's analytic tools also help to identify a cohort of patients for intensive disease management. Bon Secours holds condition-specific events, such as Diabetes Day, when patients are identified and invited to the practice for sessions on medication management, retinal exams, and other support. The practices have held similar events for asthma patients, Fortini said, and are planning one for patients identified via its BMI registry.

The more than 18 months of aggressive telephonic follow-up and use of data analytics to continually identify and manage the health needs of its patient population are paying off for Bon Secours, particularly in the critical area of hospital readmissions. "We are consistently averaging a 30-day readmission rate of around 2 percent," Fortini explained, cautioning that the assignment of patients to a primary care physician is likely contributing to this metric.

"We're reaching almost 60 percent of our patients this way, and more importantly, setting goals with the vast majority of those that we reach."

In an industry increasingly focused on value-based healthcare, these practices also ideally position Bon Secours to meet the utilization and quality measures increasingly set forth by the payors with which they are contracting.

Listen to an extended interview with Robert Fortini here.

Infographic: Rolling Out the Red Carpet to Improve Patient Satisfaction

October 2nd, 2012 by Patricia Donovan

patient satisfaction

Valet parking, online booking, concierges, turn-down service, in-room Wifi, gourmet meals…the stuff of four star hotels, right? In this case, however, we're not talking about hospitality, we're talking healthcare, and about the lengths to which hospitals, physician practices and payors will go to enhance that elusive yet all-important metric known as the Patient Experience.

This new infographic from the Healthcare Intelligence Network (HIN) highlights some key trends in the healthcare industry to impress V.I.P.s — Very Important Patients — with its service and care delivery. Lest some of these efforts seem frivolous, it is helpful to remember two things: first, that high marks in this area drive reimbursement and bonus levels for providers. And secondly, patients and health plan members are first and foremost consumers, who won't hesitate to take their business elsewhere in the wake of an unsatisfactory experience.

A survey last year by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Harvard School of Public Health found that nearly 40 percent of consumers surveyed last year said they use hospital ratings to choose a healthcare facility.

Besides the stats shared on this infographic, here's some additional data derived from HIN's 2011 survey on Improving Patient Experiences and Satisfaction:

  • 81 percent of respondents have a formal program to improve satisfaction levels of patients and members.

  • 85 percent think their scores on CMS's Hospital Compare site could be better.
  • Based on patient surveys, 80 percent say quality of care is the most important aspect of the care delivery experience, but only 7 percent are making changes in this area. Other patient gripes? Poor staff communication, say 58 percent, followed by access/wait times (42 percent).
  • More than a third — 36 percent of respondents — say it's the physician's job to improve patient/member satisfaction, while others assign this responsibility to the director of patient relations, administrators or nursing staff.
  • 91 percent survey patients on satisfaction with their care; in addition, 64 percent ask a random sampling of patients to complete the survey.
  • 59 percent say paper surveys mailed to patients' homes is the favored format for administration of satisfaction surveys;

  • 50 percent of responding hospitals offer spiritual support to hospitalized patients. Other hospital perks? Wifi (50 percent) quiet time (33 percent) and spiritual support (50 percent);

We invite you to embed this infographic on your own Web site using the code that appears beneath it. Also, share it via your social media channels. A deeper dive into the latest trends to improve patient experiences and satisfaction is reflected in 2011 Benchmarks in Patient Satisfaction Strategies: Improving the Healthcare Consumer Experience.

Get the latest healthcare infographics delivered to your e-inbox with Eye on Infographics. Click here to sign up today.

Other Infographics from HIN:

10 Hallmarks of a Health-Literate Organization

August 23rd, 2012 by Jessica Fornarotto

Recorded Webinar: Patient Engagement in the Patient-Centered Medical Home — A Continuum Approach

Leadership committed to health literacy and easy access to health information are two attributes of an organizational environment that fosters health literacy, suggests a new study reported in the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

It is possible for a healthcare system to redesign its services to better educate patients in the handling of immediate health issues and also become more savvy consumers of medicine in the long run, says the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (SFGH) study. The study identified ten attributes that healthcare organizations should adopt to make it easier for people to better navigate health information, make sense of services and better manage their own health — assistance for which there is a profound societal need.

The ten attributes of a health-literate organization are:

  1. Has leadership that makes health literacy integral to its mission, structure and operations.

  2. Integrates health literacy into planning, evaluation measures, patient safety and quality improvement.
  3. Prepares the workforce to be health-literate and monitors progress.
  4. Includes populations served in the design, implementation, and evaluation of health information and services.
  5. Meets the needs of populations with a range of health literacy skills while avoiding stigmatization.
  6. Uses health literacy strategies in interpersonal communications and confirms understanding at all points of contact.
  7. Provides easy access to health information and services and navigation assistance.
  8. Designs and distributes print, audiovisual, and social media content that is easy to understand and act on.
  9. Addresses health literacy in high-risk situations, including care transitions and communications about medicines.
  10. Communicates clearly what health plans cover and what individuals will have to pay for services.

Some 77 million people in the United States have difficulty understanding very basic health information, which clouds their ability to follow doctors’ recommendations, and millions more lack the skills necessary to make clear, informed decisions about their own healthcare, said senior author Dean Schillinger, MD, a UCSF professor of medicine, chief of the Division of General Internal Medicine at SFGH, and director of the Health Communications Program the UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at SFGH. “Depending on how you define it, nearly half the U.S. population has poor health literacy skills. Over the last two decades, we have focused on what patients can do to improve their health literacy,” said Schillinger. “In this report, we looked at the other side of the health literacy coin, and focused on what healthcare systems can do.”

The importance of enhancing health literacy has been demonstrated by many clinical studies over the years, said Schillinger. Health literacy is linked directly to patient wellness. People who can understand their health information tend to make better choices, are able to self-manage their chronic conditions, and have better outcomes than people who do not.

Adults with low health literacy may find it difficult to navigate the healthcare system, and are more likely to have higher rates of medication errors, more ER visits and hospitalizations, gaps in their preventive care, increased likelihood of dying, and poorer health outcomes for their children.

Many health policy organizations have recognized that health literacy is not only important to people, but it can also benefit society because helping patients help themselves is a way to keep healthcare costs down. Successful self-management reduces disease complications, cuts down on unnecessary ER visits and eliminates other wasteful spending.

Click here for more information and for a complete description of the ten attributes.