Archive for the ‘Healthcare Administration’ Category

Q&A: Prepping a Practice for a Case Manager

November 21st, 2011 by Jessica Papay

Physician engagement is step one in the process of embedding case managers, says Robert Fortini, VP and chief clinical officer at Bon Secours Health System. There is much value in embedding a case manager in a primary care practice, including their influence on patients’ medication compliance. Prior to presenting for HIN’s August 10 webinar on Embedded Case Management in the Primary Care Practice: Program Design and Results, Fortini discussed preparing a practice for the arrival of a case manager.


HIN: How do you prepare a physician practice for the case manager’s arrival so that a supportive environment is created?

(Robert Fortini): We don’t do anything at the practice level until we have provider engagement. Any changes that are made to the workflow are thoroughly vetted through the entire provider staff — whether mid-level or physician — and we get consensus and agreement. Typically, we have an initial meeting where everything is thoroughly explained about the case manager’s role; everyone is given a copy of the job descriptions and workflows, protocols, goals and objectives, as well as competency checklists. And everybody is thoroughly prepared in advance.

Only at that point when we have consensus from the providers, do we then proceed with the HR hiring action. By the time that’s complete and the person gets on board, the practice is completely prepared for their role.


HIN: In the January issue of the “Healthcare Finance News,” you were quoted as saying that “newly formed Bon Secours care teams of doctors and nurses and the embedded case managers would do workflow rehearsals to make sure that all teams were performing care uniformly.” Can you talk about these rehearsals and any issues or challenges that they identify?

(Robert Fortini): This concept is more of a structured manner of doing an old concept. Not all the rehearsals are pertinent to the case managers. One of the workflow rehearsals is for a standard rooming protocol for support staff. In this particular event, we’re using EPIC, an electronic medical record platform. We will rehearse with a medical assistant or a licensed practical nurse (LPN) responsible for rooming the patient what the minimum data set to be captured will be. We want to make sure that weight and height is recorded, so BMI is calculated. We want to make sure that tobacco cessation screening and counseling are addressed. We want to make sure their vital signs are done appropriately, that a past medical history and past surgical history is captured, that medication reconciliation occurs, and that refills that are due are pended for the physician to sign. This way, by the time a physician gets in the room, all the busy work is done and most of the documentation has already been started. This streamlines the physician’s role. As you can see, a case manager might not be engaged in that workflow.

Another workflow that we rehearse is the concept of a daily huddle. This is literally a team meeting at the start of the day that runs for 7-10 minutes in the hallways that we expect the case manager to be a part of. This is a review of the day’s schedule — what’s coming in that day. This way, every member of the team is prepared in advance, including the case manager, who might have specific case management functions. For example, with an elderly patient coming in at 10 a.m. with multiple co-morbidities, poly-pharmacy and who is struggling, the expectation is that the physician is going to come in and address immediate medical needs and build a relationship with that patient.

But before the patient leaves the practice, he or she will sit with the case manager for medication management and adherence education. This is why the RN case manager should be prepared in advance for what’s coming in that day. The other value to that is that the immediate clinical support staff is also prepared. They all know in advance if that patient needs to have an EKG done. And so before the physician gets in the room, the EKG has been performed and the results are available for interpretation. It streamlines the visit and improves the efficiency.

The specific workflow can get more sophisticated as the team matures. Those are standard workflows. But then we have disease-specific protocols that we also rehearse with the staff.


HIN: To add to your response, are all of these workflows, especially the more specific ones, documented?

(Robert Fortini): Absolutely. We have a protocol for each one. And the expectation of performance is very clearly established with the staff; this is what the staff will do every single time a patient arrives.


HIN: You also said in the article that medication compliance would be a focus of these care teams. Do the embedded case managers have any duties in this area?

(Robert Fortini): Yes, and the example that I just used in my answer to the second question illustrates this. It is not uncommon, especially in a well-established internal medicine practice, for the needs of the geriatric patient to be prominent. Usually that means poly-pharmacy. If you’ve ever been in a situation where you’re taking more than two or three medications a day, it can be confusing. That 20 minutes of education that the case manager will perform with the elderly patient about what each medication does and how they should be taken is invaluable. We go right down to the basics. The case managers also set up pillboxes with the patients to help make complying with a medication regimen simple.

That’s just one illustration of medication compliance. We acknowledge the fact that 30 percent of all prescriptions are never filled and that of the remaining 70 percent, probably half of them are taken incorrectly, pills are split or days are skipped. Compliance with a medication record is of paramount importance for managing a chronic illness, and in certain categories, preventing readmission.

Q&A: How Ohio Reduces Avoidable ER Visits by Medicaid Beneficiaries

November 10th, 2011 by Jessica Papay

An Ohio collaborative of Medicaid plans uses a rapid cycle quality improvement approach to reduce avoidable ER visits by its Medicaid population. In an interview prior to her presentation on Reducing Avoidable ER Visits by Medicaid Patients Through Quality-Based Interventions, Mina Chang, PH.D., provided details on the effort. Dr. Chang works for the Bureau of Health Services Research for the Ohio Department of Job & Family Services.

HIN: Why were these particular regions of Ohio chosen for the study?

(Dr. Mina Chang): The reason we focused on urban centers is that that’s where the hospital system is located. It’s high volume. We work with each of the regions and with about 30-40 healthcare leaders. It’s a local driven initiative. This group of participants would help us identify key populations that are unique, or a priority population that potentially can benefit from reducing avoidable visits. This group would also help Ohio Medicaid develop and test prevention or quality interventions that are meaningful for those populations that would be identified.

HIN: One of the five regions in the collaborative is Toledo, Ohio, which has the highest emergency department utilization in the nation. What methodology is used to reverse this trend?

(Dr. Mina Chang): We follow a methodology developed by the Institute for Health Care Improvement. It’s population-based and patient-centered. What is attractive about this methodology is that it adopted a rapid cycle, quality improvement approach that typically is focused on a very small subset of a population. With this methodology, you develop a quality improvement strategy and test it out until something is found to be effective. Then, you can in turn extend it to a larger population. It’s very different from a traditional research approach, where as you have to wait four to five years to find out that your investment has not worked.

HIN: How did you identify the priority populations for these interventions?

(Dr. Mina Chang): State Medicaid data has confirmed with what our practitioners see day in and day out in their practice. Medicaid populations predominantly are children. Many high-utilizers are upper respiratory tract infections and otitis media types of issues.

ACO Final Rule Accompanied by Advance Payments for Care Coordination Tools

October 24th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

The anxiously awaited final rule on accountable care organizations (ACOs) for Medicare beneficiaries is finally out. Based on the more than 1300 comments CMS received on its proposed ACO ruling first released in March, this new rule will make it easier to establish ACOs by providing organizations with additional funding for support tools, such as new staff or information technology systems. Under this new initiative, the Advanced Payment Model, these payments would be recovered from any future shared savings.

The second initiative, the Medicare Shared Savings Program, will provide incentives for healthcare providers who agree to work together and become accountable for coordinating care for patients. Participants who meet certain quality standards based upon, among other measures, patient outcomes and care coordination among the provider team, may share in savings they achieve for the Medicare program. Both initiatives launched on October 20th.

The United States earned low marks in healthcare access and affordability in the Commonwealth Fund’s third annual scorecard report. According to the report, the nation received a 64 out of a possible 100 when compared to best performers. Among the findings that contributed to the score were the percentage of overweight or obese children (32 percent), the number of prescription errors among elderly Medicare beneficiaries (one out of four) and the percentage of adults that reported not having a primary care provider in 2008 (44 percent).

Despite the low scores in key quality indicators, the United States is doing something right in the area of heart failure (HF) care. New research from the Yale School of Medicine shows that hospitalization rates for HF dropped by 30 percent from 1998 to 2008. One year mortality rates also dropped slightly during this period. HF ranks as the most frequent cause of hospitalization and re-hospitalization among older Americans, with related costs estimated at $39.2 billion in 2010.

In other news, 46 percent of physician practices do not meet NCQA standards for medical homes. The news, from a recent University of Michigan-led study, found that while larger, multi-specialty practice groups can more easily meet the standards, one in nine Americans receive healthcare from smaller, often solo practices. Researchers recommend initiatives to help these smaller practices team up with larger organizations to establish more medical homes.

More than 50 percent of physicians and hospitals are looking at ways to team up, a trend that is causing medical malpractice concerns. Aon’s 12th annual Hospital and Physician Professional Liability Benchmark Analysis states that healthcare systems will face significant risk management challenges associated with integrated physician-hospital arrangements. The study details the growth of integrated self-insurance strategies and highlights the challenges faced by systems as they pursue the cost of risk savings.

And lastly, what are you doing to staunch the flow and expense of avoidable emergency department use? Describe your efforts in this area by October 31 and you will receive a free executive summary of results from this second annual survey. These stories and more in this week’s issue of Healthcare Business Weekly Update.

Q&A: How to Survive and Thrive Under Bundled Payments

October 14th, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

Time in the trenches with Acute Care Episode (ACE) pilot participants qualifies Jim Reilly to comment on CMS’s latest Bundled Payments initiative specifically and bundled payment trends in general. The managing partner of TRG Healthcare Solutions shares three lessons CMS learned from the ACE pilot and more in this interview with the Healthcare Intelligence Network (HIN).

(This interview was conducted in advance of Reilly’s presentation on “Evaluating the Bundled Payment CMS Initiative — Legal, Financial, and Clinical Considerations,” an October 19, 2011 HIN webinar.)

HIN: To begin with, what did CMS learn from the ACE Pilot and how is that influencing its newest payment initiative?

Mr. Reilly: First, CMS learned that episodic payments or bundled pricing is a very effective way to incentivize hospitals and physicians to work closer together. They firmly believe combining the fees for an episodic period will lead to better coordinated care, not only between hospitals and physicians but across different specialties, to work together for optimal outcomes. They also learned that it will save CMS money. Through their bundled pricing experience in the past, this has led to lower rates that CMS pays for providers. And they also feel, finally, that it’s going to improve beneficiary health and outcomes. So it’s something that they’re investing in and moving forward with aggressively nationally.

HIN: ACE Pilot participant Baptist Health System, one of the companies that you worked with, refers to its ‘Hallmark moment’ of distributing gainshare checks to participating physicians. What are some other benefits of participation for health systems?

Mr. Reilly: Physician alignment is number one. The level of collaboration has truly increased within that health system. That then drives a greater focus on quality metrics and service metrics — not only the cost side, but also a different level of engagement in trying to move those important cardiovascular and orthopedic metrics in this case. That’s been a great benefit to the health system.

The health system is also benefitting from this experience because CMS is not the only payor that’s going to be adopting bundled payments as a way to pay for care. There will be other payors outside of CMS — outside national payors that will be active in bundled pricing. And a system like Baptist Health is well positioned to take advantage of that as well.

HIN: And finally, our fifth annual survey on the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) found that 9 percent of respondents have already begun experimenting with bundled payments. From your perspective, is this an adequate representation of the marketplace? Where do you think this trend is going?

Mr. Reilly: I don’t think it’s an adequate representation. Sometimes in this industry, we’re a little bit slow to move and be as innovative as we should be. The trend here, particularly with specialties like cardiovascular services and orthopedic services, is definitely more toward acceptance of risk in contracting with Medicare and other payors. You’ll see a great deal of activity beyond CMS, with other payors following suit.

And in order to succeed in that environment, we need more providers out there becoming clinically integrated — not only for the acute care episode, but for post-acute care services, so that we can survive and thrive under bundled payment for CMS. And other payors are going to adopt this. This current CMS bundled pricing initiative is going to escalate to other providers out there moving forward in this direction.

HIN: To follow up on that, could you define ‘clinical integration’ and explain why that needs to happen first?

Mr. Reilly: Certainly. The care process requires multiple caregivers and providers to get the optimal outcome and service. And today many times, we have competing interests among doctors and hospitals. We’ve got physicians that are dealing with challenges of running private practices; sometimes that takes away from collaborating in what is the optimal episode in amounts and levels of care provided for patients.

Once we move into alternative payment methodologies such as bundled payments, it breaks down some of those barriers. We’ve got surgeons and cardiologists and anesthesiologists and radiologists and consultants working more in a united way to ensure that that patient is getting optimal care and efficient care. That’s clinical integration.

Caring Communication Can Boost Patient Satisfaction Quotient

October 13th, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

“Do what you do so well that they will want to see it again and bring their friends.” Jack Welch’s words on customer satisfaction may not strictly apply to healthcare; after all, the former chairman and CEO of General Electric wouldn’t wish a hospital stay on anyone, no matter how elevated the quality of care.

However, in a value-driven environment, high marks in patient satisfaction are expected and rewarded, both by prospective patients seeking care at reputable facilities and by payors formulating reimbursement strategies.

To make the grade in patient satisfaction, healthcare organizations must clear the communication channels between providers and patients, say respondents to the 2011 Healthcare Intelligence Network survey on Improving Patient Satisfaction and the Healthcare Consumer Experience. That means everything from beefing up call management to increasing the number of touches while a patient is waiting for a doctor.

“Patient satisfaction might sound like a soft outcome, but patients get very dissatisfied when they are lying in an ED for long periods of time,” notes Toni Cesta, Lutheran Medical Center senior vice president of operational efficiency and capacity management.

“The most dissatisfying thing for patients in EDs is the time from triage until they are seen by a physician. That is the typical time in which the patient will walk out of the ED — if they have been triaged, put in a room and are waiting for a long period of time to be seen by the physician. If you can reduce that time from triage to seen by the physician in concert with ED leadership, that can help reduce the number of patients who walk out without being evaluated by a physician.”

So important is patient satisfaction that it has become a benchmark in its own right — to measure the success of healthcare initiatives from case management to accountable care organizations (ACOs). Beginning in April 2012, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) will award extra credit to patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) that submit CAHPS results twice a year.

Organizations preparing to join or transition to an ACO should immediately assess their patient satisfaction quotient, suggests Greg Mertz, senior project director with the Healthcare Strategy Group.

“One of the [ACO] obligations that is going to be placed on at least primary care providers is patient education, so if they haven’t spent a whole lot of time on patient compliance, or on patient satisfaction, that’s [going to be] a real learning curve issue for them…The government has said that it’s up to the physician to tell the patient that they are in an ACO. They’re going to have to convince [the patient] on no other basis than it makes good sense for your health, that you should really work with us to better manage your care.

“And since part of the evaluation of ACO shared savings is going to be based on patient input and patient satisfaction scores, [PCPs] are going to have to do it so that the patient accepts the value and is willing to give them good grades. A lot of physician behaviors are going to have to change; not that many have formal patient feedback loops at this point. It’s a different culture.”

(Excerpted from 2011 Benchmarks in Patient Satisfaction Strategies: Improving the Healthcare Consumer Experience.)

Healthcare Industry Not Prepared to Protect Patient Privacy; Data Breaches Rising

October 3rd, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

As new uses for digital health information emerge and access to confidential patient information expands, a majority of healthcare organizations are not prepared to protect patient privacy and secure data, says a new report from the Health Research Institute (HRI) at PwC US. And medical identity theft is on the rise; according to a recent PwC HRI survey, theft accounted for two thirds of total reported health data breaches over the past two years. Healthcare organizations need to update practices and adopt a more integrated approach to ensure that patient information doesn’t fall into the wrong hands, the report advises. We report on this story at length in this week’s Healthcare Business Weekly Update.

Annual premiums for employer-sponsored family health coverage increased to $15,073 this year, up 9 percent from last year, according to a recent Employer Health Benefits survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET). Premiums increased significantly faster than workers’ wages and general inflation.

To help its members navigate healthcare services and costs, BCBSF has introduced a new transparency tool, “Know Before You Go.” Designed to help its members navigate through the healthcare system, it provides information based on hospital data reported by CMS. The tool is customized to a member’s benefits and takes into account deductibles, copays and/or coinsurance amounts and estimates how much a treatment or procedure will cost.

And we are compiling research for our second annual survey on tactics to reduce avoidable emergency room visits. We will e-mail all respondents a summary of results once they are compiled. To participate, click here.

10 Ways Cancer Patients and Physicians Can Better Communicate

September 29th, 2011 by Jessica Papay

Talking with doctors about cancer and cancer treatments can feel like learning a new language, and people facing cancer diagnoses often need help to understand their treatment options, and the risks and benefits of each choice.

The U-M Health System suggests 10 things healthcare professionals can do to help improve the way they communicate information about treatment risks to patients. These suggestions from the associate professor of internal medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School and a University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center researcher, and colleagues, explain how patients can tap into these same best practices to become fluent in the language of cancer care and better understand their options:

1. Insist on plain language. If a patient does not understand something their doctor says, the patient should ask their doctor to explain it better.

2. Focus on the absolute risk. The most important statistic a patient should consider is the chance that something will happen to them. Sometimes, the effect of cancer treatments is described using language like “this drug will cut your risk in half.” But, such relative risk statements do not say anything about how likely this is. Research has shown that using relative risk makes both patients and doctors more likely to favor a treatment, because they believe it to be more beneficial than it actually may be.

If, instead, a doctor says to a patient “the drug will lower your risk of cancer from 4 to 2 percent,” now the patient knows that most people will not get cancer regardless. And it will give the patient the exact benefit they would get from taking the drug.

3. Visualize the risks. Instead of thinking about risk numbers, patients should try drawing out 100 boxes and coloring in one box for each percentage point of risk. If their risk of a side effect is 10 percent, they would color in 10 boxes. This kind of visual representation, called a pictograph, can help people understand the meaning behind the numbers.

4. Consider risk as a frequency rather than as percentages. What does it mean to say 60 percent of men who have a radical prostatectomy will experience impotence? Imagine a roomful of 100 people: 60 of them will have this side effect and 40 will not. Thinking of risk in terms of groups of people can help make statistics easier to understand.

5. Focus on the additional risk. Patients may be told the risk of a certain side effect occurring is 7 percent. But if the patient did not take the drug, is there a chance they’d still experience that? Patients should ask what the additional or incremental risk of a treatment is.

6. The order of information matters. Studies have shown that the last thing someone hears is most likely to stick. When making a treatment decision, patients should not forget to consider all of the information and statistics they’ve learned.

7. Write it down. Patients may be presented with a lot of information. At the end of the discussion, the patient should ask their doctor if a written summary of the risks and benefits is available. Or, the patient could ask the doctor to help them summarize all the information in writing.

8. Don’t get hung up on averages. Some studies have found that learning the average risk of a disease does not help patients make good decisions about what’s best for them. A patient’s risk is what matters — not anyone else’s. Patients should focus on the information that applies specifically to them.

9. Less may be more. Patients should not get overwhelmed by too much information. In some cases, there may be many different treatment options but only a few may be relevant to the patient. Patients should ask their doctor to narrow it down and only discuss with them the options and facts most relevant for them.

10. Consider your risk over time. A cancer patient’s risk may change over time. If a patient is told that the five-year risk of their cancer returning after a certain treatment, the patient should ask what the 10-year or 20-year risk is. In some cases, this data might not be available, but patients should always be aware of the timeframe involved.

New Transitions of Care Credential Program for Case Managers

September 14th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

A timely new certification in care transitions recognizes skills and expertise in patient handoffs between sites of care.

The Case Management Society of America (CMSA) and the American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians, Inc. (ABQAURP) are collaborating to create a sub-specialty certification for transitions of care (TOC.) According to the CMSA web site, this new credential is

“the first one to support professionals not only as a team, but also individually, who demonstrate competence and skills in providing the key elements of transitions of care.”

Successful transitions of care from one managed care environment to another are key to reducing hospital readmissions and improving overall healthcare costs and patient satisfaction. According to market research compiled in Healthcare Intelligence Network’s second annual Managing Care Transitions Across Sites survey conducted in May 2010, the hospital-to-home transition is the most critical transition in care, followed by skilled nursing facility (SNF)-to-home (49.2 percent) and ER-to-home transitions (45.9).

But until now, care transitions haven’t traditionally been part of medical education and training; according to the American Geriatrics Society:

  • Nearly 20% of Medicare patients readmitted to hospital within a month
  • Patients are frequently confused and dissatisfied by the discharge process
  • Communication between hospitalists and PCPs is equent
  • And patients are suffering: from those recently hospitalized who are often discharged without proper instructions on what medications to take or resume taking to faulty or incomplete handoffs of patients between provider shifts in teaching hospitals that may be responsible for more medical errors than overworked, sleep-deprived medical residents.

    The majority of HIN’s survey respondents said that post-transition patient contact, such as home follow-up visits and post-discharge telephone calls, were the most successful strategies to improve care transitions.

    And more than half of the respondents said that the case manager was most frequently charged with care transition management.

    Says Jan Van der Mei, continuum case management director at Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region:

    “One of the main focuses for care coordination is to avoid duplication of services when patients move from one site of care to the next. When someone is leaving the hospital, care coordination can help the patient get a follow-up appointment. When you are monitoring the patient, it may be helping them get to the office instead of going to the ED.

    “It is also many rounds of addressing the psychosocial issues and making sure that patients can actually make it to their appointments – that they have transportation and that when they get a new prescription, they are able to pick up the prescription and pay for it,” Van der Mei continues.

    Other elements for care coordination involve making sure when a PCP refers a patient to a specialist, that the specialist has the necessary information so they can provide the assessment that is being sought without actually duplicating tests that have already been done, recommends Van der Mei.

    Says Mary Beth Newman, MSN, RN-BC, CMAC, CCP, CCM, as quoted on the CMSA web site:

    “…we have worked hard to design the credential to help identify best practices, as well as to assist case managers in making recommendations that balance the appropriateness of health care services with cost and quality as related to transitions. It is vital that the program address the need for effectiveness, efficiency, equity, safety, and timeliness in transitions of care.”

    7 Domains of NCQA Fall ACO Accreditation: Benefits for Early Adopters

    August 30th, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

    Early adopters of the NCQA ACO accreditation effort launching this fall are eligible for discounted survey fees, online education tools and promotion via NCQA press release. Order the NCQA ACO standards.

    NCQA worked with consumer advocates, purchasers and other healthcare and managed care experts to develop seven standards by which it will evaluate Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). The ACO Accreditation program evaluates organizations in seven domains:

    1. ACO Structure and Operations

    The organization clearly defines its organizational structure, demonstrates capability to manage resources and aligns provider incentives through payment arrangements and other mechanisms to promote the delivery of efficient and effective care.

    2. Access to Needed Providers

    The organization has sufficient numbers and types of practitioners and provides timely access to culturally competent healthcare.

    3. Patient-Centered Primary Care

    The primary care practices within the organization act as medical homes for patients.

    4. Care Management

    The organization collects, integrates and uses data from various sources for care management, performance reporting and identifying patients for population health programs. The organization provides resources to patients and practitioners to support care management activities.

    5. Care Coordination and Transitions

    The organization facilitates timely exchange of information between providers, patients and their caregivers to promote safe transitions.

    6. Patient Rights and Responsibilities

    The organization informs patients about the role of the ACO and its services. It is transparent about its clinical performance and any performance-based financial incentives offered to practitioners.

    7. Performance Reporting and Quality Improvement

    The organization measures and publically reports performance on clinical quality of care, patient experience and cost measures. The organization identifies opportunities for improvement and brings together providers and stakeholders to collaborate on improvement initiatives.

    Warning: Winds of Healthcare Change Ahead

    August 29th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

    As we go to press Friday afternoon, Hurricane Irene is threatening to pummel our eastern coastline with winds greater than 80 mph; store shelves have been emptied of bottled water and batteries and anyone searching for a generator is probably out of luck.

    Healthcare, too, is preparing for the winds of change as reform laws descend upon it, and many preparations are being made in its wake. HHS just announced it is awarding $40 million in grants to identify and enroll children eligible for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). The two-year grants are authorized under the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) of 2009, and part of the administration’s push to ensure all eligible children.

    In a move to address shifting reimbursement plans, CMS is proposing four bundled payment plan models. These models are designed to align payments for services delivered during an episode of care, rather than paying for services separately. This new initiative will give providers the flexibility to determine which episodes of care and which services will be bundled together. Read more about this proposal in this week’s Healthcare Business Weekly Update.

    And lastly, nearly one of every 10 mid-sized or big employers might stop offering health coverage to workers after insurance exchanges begin operating in 2014, states a recent survey from Towers Watson. The survey, which involved more than 1200 companies, says that the companies are willing to risk the ensuing fees and tax headaches that could arise with such a move. Last year, the average annual health insurance premium for employer-sponsored family coverage was $13,770 per worker, with companies picking up most of that tab,
    according to the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. That cost has more than doubled since 2000.

    But survey officials stress that these results aren’t written in stone, and that employers could change their minds given all the unresolved variables, not unlike the hurricane headed our way. We’ll just have to see what path the storm takes.